I was talking latency, yes.
hint: if you're only looking at the bandwidth and not the latency, you are not looking at the proper picture. I'm not saying these are accurate screenshots, but looking at just the bandwidth is one of the worst mistakes you can make.
Remember the old truck full of media analogy. That's a *lot* of bandwidth, but would it work for cache? Bandwidth is not the most important characteristic of processor cache. Or rather, a lesser bandwidth cache can give more of a boost than a higher bandwidth cache if latency is low. It's more complex than just looking at the bandwidth alone.
hint: if you're only looking at the bandwidth and not the latency, you are not looking at the proper picture. I'm not saying these are accurate screenshots, but looking at just the bandwidth is one of the worst mistakes you can make.
Remember the old truck full of media analogy. That's a *lot* of bandwidth, but would it work for cache? Bandwidth is not the most important characteristic of processor cache. Or rather, a lesser bandwidth cache can give more of a boost than a higher bandwidth cache if latency is low. It's more complex than just looking at the bandwidth alone.
Last edited:
