• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FX-55 and A64 4000+

I

icewildabeast

Member
I looked at a few reviews and benchmarks, and found only a couple differnaces in benchmarks. But the reviews themselves are unclear about a couple things.

A) Are they both on 90nm technology?
B) Multipliers: Unlocked or locked?
C) Voltage?
D) Overclockablility?
E) Differences in cache?
F) Differences in instruction sets?

G) Anything I missed/overlooked?

PS: If you dont know, or not sure yourself, please dont try answering the questions you dont know, I want concrete answers, not half-assed ones.

~Will
 
a. no, both 130nm
b. 4000+ =lock, FX-55=unlocked
c. not sure...
d. 4000+ good, FX-55 great
e. both 1MB cache
f. Same
g. Socket 939, 4000+ runs at 2.4 GHz, FX-55 runs at 2.6 GHz
 
Hehe, I remember the guy who bit on his FX and said it tasted like wood.

Anyway, read the Article on Anandtech 😉

The Athlon64 4000+ is just a rebadged Athlon64 FX-53 with a multiplier lock.

The Athlon64 FX-55 is the same as the FX-53 but with a 200mhz core speed increase.
 
Originally posted by: piroroadkill
Hehe, I remember the guy who bit on his FX and said it tasted like wood.

Anyway, read the Article on Anandtech 😉

The Athlon64 4000+ is just a rebadged Athlon64 FX-53 with a multiplier lock.

The Athlon64 FX-55 is the same as the FX-53 but with a 200mhz core speed increase.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top