• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Future Xbox Graphics to Rival Avatar?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Well .00001 fps is still better than Saints Row 2.

SR2 is not THAT bad, it can get bad but its still a great game. Unless you are talking about the PC version. No PC in the world can run that at its highest settings totally smooth.
 
SR2 is not THAT bad, it can get bad but its still a great game. Unless you are talking about the PC version. No PC in the world can run that at its highest settings totally smooth.

I know, I was just kidding. I love SR2, I've played through it 4 or 5 times now, and am playing it again right now. The frame rate can get really bad at times though.
 
I remember them saying that back in really early 1995. Howard Lincoln was all saying how advanced the POS SGI "Reality" chipset would be and said it would feature the same effects as hollywood movies.

In reality (pun not intended), the damn thing paled in comparison to 3dfx's first Voodoo chipset released around the time the N64 was.
Anyone remember the stupid rumors about how the PS2 was going to be sold in the States only because if its advances tech fell in the wrong hands it could be used to launch missiles?
 
Back
Top