IHateMyJob2004
Lifer
I've mentioned it once or twice. Herre's a short argument.
In the future, cars will not be hydrogen based. They will use capacitors for storage. Currently, capacitors are being used for watches and flashlights...not batteries.
Why?
Well, when capacitors of 1 Farad used to be the size of a room. Today, one Farad can be held in your hand. what tomorrow? Well, not necessarily capacitors but possibly nanotubes:
From: http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/WPW/Power/ElectricStor.htm
OIK, I know. That's for laptops. Point is it's the idea of miniturization of electrical storage devices while retaining the storage capacity. Over time, this will occur, whether it's nanotubes or capacitors. And prices will drop and it will be realizable option for vehicles. And with lower weight, vehicles will actualyl require less stored energy per mile! Making redundant vehicles would also be a possiblity. It's not hard to make the front wheels powered by system A and back wheels powered by system B. if one fails, you can still drive it to a repair center.
I don't understand all this hydrogen hype. It might be a technology we use in the future, but I don't see it's day lasting more than 10-20 years. With just electrical storage, there would be fewer parts an/or fewer types of parts. might have one "storage cell" or 100 in parallel. Same technology is the point.
The future is good!
And with solar/wind/etc, storing and transporting energy will be realizable. Imagine large semis that are essentially "stored eelctrons" driviing down the road jsut like we se oil trucks today! 😉
In the future, cars will not be hydrogen based. They will use capacitors for storage. Currently, capacitors are being used for watches and flashlights...not batteries.
Why?
Well, when capacitors of 1 Farad used to be the size of a room. Today, one Farad can be held in your hand. what tomorrow? Well, not necessarily capacitors but possibly nanotubes:
From: http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/WPW/Power/ElectricStor.htm
NEC and Sony are jointly developing a laptop battery that draws on ability of carbon nanotubes to store energy. The companies claim that the battery will last weeks between charges. Mitsubishi and Motorola are also pursuing CN-based batteries, which offer the potential of assuming any shape or even being embedded in a device's plastic casing. (PC Magazine, July 2004, p 137.)
OIK, I know. That's for laptops. Point is it's the idea of miniturization of electrical storage devices while retaining the storage capacity. Over time, this will occur, whether it's nanotubes or capacitors. And prices will drop and it will be realizable option for vehicles. And with lower weight, vehicles will actualyl require less stored energy per mile! Making redundant vehicles would also be a possiblity. It's not hard to make the front wheels powered by system A and back wheels powered by system B. if one fails, you can still drive it to a repair center.
I don't understand all this hydrogen hype. It might be a technology we use in the future, but I don't see it's day lasting more than 10-20 years. With just electrical storage, there would be fewer parts an/or fewer types of parts. might have one "storage cell" or 100 in parallel. Same technology is the point.
The future is good!
And with solar/wind/etc, storing and transporting energy will be realizable. Imagine large semis that are essentially "stored eelctrons" driviing down the road jsut like we se oil trucks today! 😉