Future Computer Upgrade / High end parts?

ProUser

Senior member
Apr 6, 2000
554
0
0
Ok, the time has come to upgrade the computer. Probably in the next few months. In the past, I have always gone for the budget rig, squeezing every ounce of juice out of every component. Unfortunately, when it comes time to upgrade - I am stuck having to start from the ground up.

This time, I am considering buying quality/higher end products. Like a REAL nice case, a REAL nice power supply, and 2 Raptor hard drives, etc.

I guess my problem is, while I can afford all of this stuff - does it really make that much of a difference when it comes to longevity and upgradability? I figure a good case and power supply will last a long time. But will high quality $200 worth of memory really be THAT much better and last longer then say memory half the price? And is a $150 motherboard really going to be better and last longer then a $99 motherboard+processor special at Fry's?

I guess I'm second guessing my decision to actually spend a decent amount of money on my computer, because I'm worried in less than a year from now when the 64 bit proc's, new memory, etc all come out I'll be yet again having to build an entirely new machine.
 

thorin

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
7,573
0
0
It's easy spend little on what you're going to replace quickly and lots on what you'll carry between systems. For example:

I got a 2100+ (Thoroughbred) + K7S5A for $145 (CDN) and at the time when a 2600+ and nForce board woulda been about $360. Now if I had decided my 2100+ and K7S5A weren't cutting it I could now upgrade to a 2600+ and nForce (or NF2) baord for ~$145 CDN (and still be $70 ahead). IMHO my 2100+ and ECS baord are still doing their job just fine but when I decide to upgrade to a Parris (Athlon64 w/ 256k) and a NF3 (er whatever) I'll still have the $215 to spend and only likely need $150'ish when I get there. As for my HDs, case and PSU they'll be carried over to my next system(s) and I've spent a bit more on them. I don't see any point is spending 2x as much on parts that you're going to upgrade quickly. Go bang for buck on things you won't reuse between systems.

As for memory I only needed and bought PC2100 (266) until I decided I needed more for WinXP and the stuff I work on then I purchased 2700 because it was the same price as the 2100 at the time. However I didn't see any point in paying (2.5 or 3x) for 400 since by the time I upgrade Parris will be using 433 or 500 ... or 400 will be the same price as the 266 I bought originally.

Thorin
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
But will high quality $200 worth of memory really be THAT much better and last longer then say memory half the price? And is a $150 motherboard really going to be better and last longer then a $99 motherboard+processor special at Fry's
this is always a tough decision. If, say, an XP 2500+ is going to be fast enough to last you a year and you think you "need" to move to A64 or socket775 then, go with a cheap but decent mobo and DDR333 instead of 400.

If oyu want to buy now and wait 2 years to upgrade, go with a P4 at 2.8 - 3.0 and DDR 400. The 2.8 is the sweet spot on the (non-overclocking) power curve, and you can always upgrade to 3.2 or 3.4 GHz next year if you decide you need a (slight) speed bump, though a graphics card replacement will make more of a difference for games.
 

ProUser

Senior member
Apr 6, 2000
554
0
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
But will high quality $200 worth of memory really be THAT much better and last longer then say memory half the price? And is a $150 motherboard really going to be better and last longer then a $99 motherboard+processor special at Fry's
this is always a tough decision. If, say, an XP 2500+ is going to be fast enough to last you a year and you think you "need" to move to A64 or socket775 then, go with a cheap but decent mobo and DDR333 instead of 400.

If oyu want to buy now and wait 2 years to upgrade, go with a P4 at 2.8 - 3.0 and DDR 400. The 2.8 is the sweet spot on the (non-overclocking) power curve, and you can always upgrade to 3.2 or 3.4 GHz next year if you decide you need a (slight) speed bump, though a graphics card replacement will make more of a difference for games.


My current plan was to try and hold off until September, when hopefully the AMD64 comes out and drops prices on everything else. Then probably upgrade *hopefullY* 2 years down the line when 64 bit world has a better foothold.

I am planning on getting the Radeon 9800 Ultra (hopefully the prices will fall quite a bit next few months... please) and was thinking of getting a Barton in the 2500 - 3000 range. I'm just not sure how much longevity those chips are going to have, so shelling out $200 for memory and $150 for a quality motherboard... well I'm just a little hesitant.. :)