Fury X gpuz

[csbin]

http://videocardz.com/56795/first-amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review-samples-are-in-the-wild


128ROPs？

 

[LTC8K6]

256GB/s?

I think we have some GPU-Z errors here.

 

[Despoiler]

256GB/s?

I think we have some GPU-Z errors here.

Most definitely. We already know the ROPs are 64 and the mem bandwidth is 512.

 

[exar333]

0.8.3 is a month old, so I would think its just not been updated to reflect these correctly. I would guess a new version will hit this week or next to include better 390x and Fiji support. 390x is probably fine because the only differences between 290/x Hawaii is core freq bump, mem freq bump and 8GB memory. All those should reflect just fine already...

 

[LTC8K6]

0.8.3

Added VGA BIOS UEFI support indicator
Added support for NVIDIA GTX 980 Ti, GTX 965M, GTX 950M, NVS315, GT 750 (GK106)
Added support for AMD Fiji, Radeon R2/R3 Graphics (Mullins APU)
Added support for various Intel Broadwell SKUs
Fixed missing NVIDIA PerfCap sensor in some cases
Added support for HBM memory
Fixed GT200B die size
Fixed some NV42 specs
Improved OpenCl detection code

 

[IEC]

0.8.3

Added VGA BIOS UEFI support indicator
Added support for NVIDIA GTX 980 Ti, GTX 965M, GTX 950M, NVS315, GT 750 (GK106)
Added support for AMD Fiji, Radeon R2/R3 Graphics (Mullins APU)
Added support for various Intel Broadwell SKUs
Fixed missing NVIDIA PerfCap sensor in some cases
Added support for HBM memory
Fixed GT200B die size
Fixed some NV42 specs
Improved OpenCl detection code

Considering that directly contravenes AMD's published Fury X specs, I'd say yeah, it's GPU-Z needing to make a database update.

 

[SPBHM]

0.8.3

Added VGA BIOS UEFI support indicator
Added support for NVIDIA GTX 980 Ti, GTX 965M, GTX 950M, NVS315, GT 750 (GK106)
Added support for AMD Fiji, Radeon R2/R3 Graphics (Mullins APU)
Added support for various Intel Broadwell SKUs
Fixed missing NVIDIA PerfCap sensor in some cases
Added support for HBM memory
Fixed GT200B die size
Fixed some NV42 specs
Improved OpenCl detection code

" Fixed some NV42 specs"

they are still fixing specs for a GPU from 2004, I'm sure the specs from Fury X are wrong (it's 64ROPs, 512GB/s)

 

[loccothan]

It's confirmed FURY has 128 ROP's
And highly Overclockable HBM gRAM 😀 -> it means Hudge perf. BOOST OMG
My good i will have it october/december ....

 

[EndlessWargasm]

It's confirmed FURY has 128 ROP's.

Na, 64 ROPs, but they are going to be at least as efficient as Tonga ROPs, much better than Hawaii ROPs. Shouldn't be a bottle neck.

 

[NTMBK]

And highly Overclockable HBM gRAM 😀

I don't think that's true, you know... But you shouldn't need to OC the memory anyway, it's already got double the bandwidth of Hawaii!

 

[RaulF]

It's confirmed FURY has 128 ROP's
And highly Overclockable HBM gRAM 😀 -> it means Hudge perf. BOOST OMG
My good i will have it october/december ....

Confirmed by who?

 

[exar333]

Lots of stuff wrong here. Again, an old GPU-Z version....updated version on or after launch should clear this up.

 

[gamervivek]

Some folks put more trust in gpuz over AMD if it shows that AMD are rebranding again. :hmm:

 

[exar333]

Some folks put more trust in gpuz over AMD if it shows that AMD are rebranding again. :hmm:

Agree.

Seriously, with how secretive this launch has been, I don't have a lot of faith in a over 1 month-old GPU version on a product not even launched.

CPU-Z is generally 'more' reliable on ES or non-released products as it usually gets the core counts, cache, TDP and freq. no problem. A brand-new GPU arch is a whole other game...

 

[m4ng4]

GPU Load is at a constant 100% with the new r9 Fury X...
Also in evry game i have stutter..
This also happen when benchmarking.. 900fps then once every second goes down to about 30fps and back up..

am i the only one having this problem!?