Originally posted by: Stunt
Most people don't care for a precise measurement.
They just want to know when to fill up.
Full, 3/4, half usually means nothing to the average driver.
Talk about changes on inclines...Originally posted by: Jahee
I suppose... it can't be hard to measure by different means though... weight for example!Originally posted by: Stunt
Most people don't care for a precise measurement.
They just want to know when to fill up.
Full, 3/4, half usually means nothing to the average driver.
From Full to 3/4 goes reeeally slow, but then 3/4 to half goes in about 60 miles! its really annoying lol..
Originally posted by: Fayd
sound above the fuel, to determine the empty space in the tank and calculate based on that.
course, there's baffles in the tank to prevent sloshing.. so that'd make that kind of hard.
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: Stunt
Most people don't care for a precise measurement.
They just want to know when to fill up.
Full, 3/4, half usually means nothing to the average driver.
I suppose... it can't be hard to measure by different means though... weight for example!
From Full to 3/4 goes reeeally slow, but then 3/4 to half goes in about 60 miles! its really annoying lol..
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: Fayd
sound above the fuel, to determine the empty space in the tank and calculate based on that.
course, there's baffles in the tank to prevent sloshing.. so that'd make that kind of hard.
What do you mean by baffles?
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Or get a car that just tells you how many miles you have left on a given tank of gas that changes dynamically based on your driving.
My girlfriend Ford Fusion has this and it's awesome.
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: Fayd
sound above the fuel, to determine the empty space in the tank and calculate based on that.
course, there's baffles in the tank to prevent sloshing.. so that'd make that kind of hard.
What do you mean by baffles?
Baffles are like partitions, designed to separate the tank into smaller sections so as to minimize fuel sloshing from one end to the other. With baffles, the fuel will only slosh over a couple inches.
On larger aircraft, fuel cells contain multiple fuel quantity sensors, and they "average" out readings from different locations in the tank. When we depart in a 727 and climb out at a 20 or 25 degree angle, our gauges don't budge at all, save for normal fuel burns. But it would probably not be cost effective to implement that into vehicles, especially since the consequences of running out of fuel in a car pale in comparison to running out of fuel in a plane. When it comes to vehicles, the "best" indicator, I think, is the number of miles driven since you last filled up.
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: Stunt
Most people don't care for a precise measurement.
They just want to know when to fill up.
Full, 3/4, half usually means nothing to the average driver.
I suppose... it can't be hard to measure by different means though... weight for example!
From Full to 3/4 goes reeeally slow, but then 3/4 to half goes in about 60 miles! its really annoying lol..
Gas tanks are usually built in the shape of a V..and since the sensor is just vertical, the meter will go down slower in the beginning.
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: Fayd
sound above the fuel, to determine the empty space in the tank and calculate based on that.
course, there's baffles in the tank to prevent sloshing.. so that'd make that kind of hard.
What do you mean by baffles?
Baffles are like partitions, designed to separate the tank into smaller sections so as to minimize fuel sloshing from one end to the other. With baffles, the fuel will only slosh over a couple inches.
On larger aircraft, fuel cells contain multiple fuel quantity sensors, and they "average" out readings from different locations in the tank. When we depart in a 727 and climb out at a 20 or 25 degree angle, our gauges don't budge at all, save for normal fuel burns. But it would probably not be cost effective to implement that into vehicles, especially since the consequences of running out of fuel in a car pale in comparison to running out of fuel in a plane. When it comes to vehicles, the "best" indicator, I think, is the number of miles driven since you last filled up.
How do they measure the quantity out of interest? pressure?
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Or get a car that just tells you how many miles you have left on a given tank of gas that changes dynamically based on your driving.
My girlfriend Ford Fusion has this and it's awesome.
Originally posted by: Jahee
Originally posted by: Stunt
Most people don't care for a precise measurement.
They just want to know when to fill up.
Full, 3/4, half usually means nothing to the average driver.
I suppose... it can't be hard to measure by different means though... weight for example!
From Full to 3/4 goes reeeally slow, but then 3/4 to half goes in about 60 miles! its really annoying lol..
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Or get a car that just tells you how many miles you have left on a given tank of gas that changes dynamically based on your driving.
My girlfriend Ford Fusion has this and it's awesome.
My Audi A4 has one of those, and it's painfully inaccurate. My car often says that I have 440 miles of fuel range after I fill it, but I only average 325 miles before the low fuel light comes on. Even with flat highway driving, I can't crack 380 miles before that low fuel light comes on. When that low fuel light comes on, the trip computer usually says that I have 40 miles left. I've driven it over 50 miles after that light comes on, and I still had a gallon left in the tank when I finally filled it! In other words, the computer is way too optimistic about the range when you first fill it, and gets overly pessimistic once the tank gets low.
Amusingly, my old Mercury Cougar had a trip computer as well, and that one was far more accurate at guessing my range. Go figure.