Originally posted by: chinkgai
my local frys ad in the bay area had this for 89 instead of 79
Originally posted by: tjaisv
i'm tired of these slow-ass 7200RPM SATA hard drives...
when are 10000RPM 16MB cache hard drives with 200GB capacity gonna be here?
Originally posted by: Elixer
Originally posted by: tjaisv
i'm tired of these slow-ass 7200RPM SATA hard drives...
when are 10000RPM 16MB cache hard drives with 200GB capacity gonna be here?
Pfffttt... 10K drives are barely any faster than 7200 rpm drives.
Pretty much the same thing as going from ATA 100 to ATA 133...and while I am at it, SATA drives are barely faster (if at all) than PATA drives.
For speed RAID 0 is the way to go.
We need SATA II drives to see some real speed increases.
Or some nice SCSI drives, but I haven't seen SCSI drives on sale ever. lol![]()
True... but I mean the SATA II specs that call for 600Mbytes/sec transfersOriginally posted by: Blazin Trav
Originally posted by: Elixer
Originally posted by: tjaisv
i'm tired of these slow-ass 7200RPM SATA hard drives...
when are 10000RPM 16MB cache hard drives with 200GB capacity gonna be here?
Pfffttt... 10K drives are barely any faster than 7200 rpm drives.
Pretty much the same thing as going from ATA 100 to ATA 133...and while I am at it, SATA drives are barely faster (if at all) than PATA drives.
For speed RAID 0 is the way to go.
We need SATA II drives to see some real speed increases.
Or some nice SCSI drives, but I haven't seen SCSI drives on sale ever. lol![]()
SATA II drives are already out man...
Originally posted by: Elixer
True... but I mean the SATA II specs that call for 600Mbytes/sec transfersOriginally posted by: Blazin Trav
Originally posted by: Elixer
Originally posted by: tjaisv
i'm tired of these slow-ass 7200RPM SATA hard drives...
when are 10000RPM 16MB cache hard drives with 200GB capacity gonna be here?
Pfffttt... 10K drives are barely any faster than 7200 rpm drives.
Pretty much the same thing as going from ATA 100 to ATA 133...and while I am at it, SATA drives are barely faster (if at all) than PATA drives.
For speed RAID 0 is the way to go.
We need SATA II drives to see some real speed increases.
Or some nice SCSI drives, but I haven't seen SCSI drives on sale ever. lol![]()
SATA II drives are already out man...![]()
Which is why I said that they are barely faster, if at all, than ATA100 or ATA133.Originally posted by: Loki726
When was the last time you had a drive that came anywhere near the 150mb/s "called for" by SATA I?Originally posted by: Elixer
True... but I mean the SATA II specs that call for 600Mbytes/sec transfersOriginally posted by: Blazin Trav
SATA II drives are already out man...![]()
Originally posted by: Skyhack
Originally posted by: chinkgai
my local frys ad in the bay area had this for 89 instead of 79
Chicago area (Downer's Grove) Fry's has it for $89 too.