• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Friends

bps, not Bp/s

And are you sure they said GB and not MB? When 12 MB of RAM was common, GB hard drives were NOT.

Is there anything else you're trying to point out other than that they said 28,000 and not 28,800?
 
Originally posted by: mugs
bps, not Bp/s

And are you sure they said GB and not MB? When 12 MB of RAM was common, GB hard drives were NOT.
Click to expand...

My mistake. I always screw up the bps/Bps/kbps/kBps/whatever/whatever up. I'm certain he said GB's.
 
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: mugs
bps, not Bp/s

And are you sure they said GB and not MB? When 12 MB of RAM was common, GB hard drives were NOT.
Click to expand...

My mistake. I always screw up the bps/Bps/kbps/kBps/whatever/whatever up. I'm certain he said GB's.
Click to expand...

Well then that's strange.

They were probably trying not to sound redundant by using MB twice... people expected a lot less accuracy regarding computers from TV and movies back then.

Or they could have just been dumb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top