Fried cpu

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
does anyone have a link to a forum or article on somebody frying a core2duo because of heat/overclocking?

i've searched all over and cant find any instances of somebody frying one of these, just seems kinda strange.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,585
10,225
126
Why does it seem strange? Intel added TM1 and TM2 features so that their chips wouldn't burn.
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,615
2,023
126
See -- one thing missing here are statistics on processor longevity through over-clocking.

And the reason they're missing, is that-- first -- Intel probably has them, but releasing them is not expedient; and second -- we go through processors faster than a gorilla on a food binge eats bananas, so nobody ever really finds out!!

I didn't even really find out when I blew my northbridge memory controller on a socket-478 Prescott "E." At least now, the motherboard makers and memory makers are building at specs ahead of the processors, so the risk is isolated mostly to the latter.
 

Denithor

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2004
6,298
23
81
Well, I can say that my e6400 (B2 stepping, purchased July last year) has been running 2.4 to 3.0GHz since I got it, in several different motherboards, with F@H running constantly that entire time. No issues whatsoever. If anything I now have a bit better performance with my new IP35-E (running 3GHz @ stock volts where previously on 965P-DS3 rev1 I had to run 1.35V just to hit 2.8GHz completely stable).
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
well i was curious because i want to know the threshold of my e4300 and its been hitting 80 degrees when both cores are used 100%, sometimes i hear a beep come out of my pc speaker, lol. I just want to know if i have to be weary of its longevity

1.38volts 3.28ghz
 

BonzaiDuck

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
16,615
2,023
126
Well, if you mean the peak core temperatures are going that high -- to 80C -- at full load, my personal opinion is this: you've clocked and volted it too high. I don't know what the stock speed for that processor is (off the top of my head), but the "TCASE" temperature -- 10 or 15C lower than the cores -- shouldn't really run higher than about 60C, because at that point, it's almost on top of the "throttling" temperature. And it would be even worse if you haven't enabled the BIOS to let it throttle back. . . . Let me see . . . . I'm looking at NewEgg's spec-sheet on the Allendale . . .

Again, just my opinion, but that's in excess of a 75% over-clock. From my AMD friends, I know that they don't much OC their Athlon X2's more than 50%. These new Intel processors are a departure from the earlier single-core processors, in that people were satisfied to get a 25% over-clock with the single-cores.

But on these forums, most of the "sane" OC settings I've seen are no higher than 50% over the stock value.

Now . . . . much of our attention has been focused on "middle-of-the-line" models like the E6600 and Q6600 (quad). I haven't paid much attention in recent months to the Allendale or the lower end of the E6xxx product line -- for instance, last year, people were getting extraordinary results with the E6300. But my basic feeling about it is that 75% over stock settings is too much.

Not knowing the retail-box maximum on that Allendale, I'd say that the VCore looks pretty low for the speed you've attained, but the increase in bus speed is a major source of heat, and if you're not damaging the chip with voltage, the heat will do it. . . . . Yeah . . . .your voltage is only 6% above the retail maximum, but the bus speed just seems too high.

You might try for some sort of better cooling solution, but . . . .
 

Regalk

Golden Member
Feb 7, 2000
1,137
0
0
Originally posted by: jaredpace
well i was curious because i want to know the threshold of my e4300 and its been hitting 80 degrees when both cores are used 100%, sometimes i hear a beep come out of my pc speaker, lol. I just want to know if i have to be weary of its longevity

1.38volts 3.28ghz

So you did have a valid question after all. Your oc looks OK compared to mine (I am at 413 X 8) on the GA-DS3L with E4500 Thermalright U 120e. I hope you are not using stock cooler. The stock cooler that came with my E4500 (and E2160) is the worst I have seen from Intel recently compared to what my other E6300 came with (that was bigger and had a copper base) I took off the fan to use for other things and threw away the stock HS.
Your voltage looks good if stable. My idle is at 30C and loan using orthos at approx 62/63C. I could never live with 80C - waaay too high.
 

betasub

Platinum Member
Mar 22, 2006
2,677
0
0
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Why does it seem strange? Intel added TM1 and TM2 features so that their chips wouldn't burn.

QFT. Thermal protection will kick in, first underclocking/undervolting(?), then automatically shutting down, as temperatures increase.