The Quran doesn't even require a woman to wear the hijab, its used by men to oppress women, why dont men have to cover there hairIt's stupid that they banned the hijab though.... it is clearly a violation of freedom of expression/speech like we have here in the States.
Western world already did that to the other religions, just one remains with majority approved blood stained hands.I wonder if this could be the one and only victory for trolls. Essentially keep trolling the Muslims until they are just completely desensitized and run out of outrage.
Then they could take their act out on each religion until they all just get over their self-importance.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.... oh man. That's a good one.Western world already did that to the other religions, just one remains with majority approved blood stained hands.
Except it was up to the people if it was a practice they wanted to participate in. The French Government didn't force women to wear them so oppression not found. I'm not a fan of the hijab, but it us not my place or yours nor anyone else's to say they can't wear them.The Quran doesn't even require a woman to wear the hijab, its used by men to oppress women, why dont men have to cover there hair
I think you have no idea about what "Left" really means, beyond the crap that's usually passed in U.S. as information (or, more realistically, popular culture).Cant wait for all the idiot leftists to cry racism and how we shouldn't do this
They didn't ban the hijab, they banned the niqab. There are very legitimate public safety reasons for that because the niqab completely covers the face and makes a person unidentifiable.It's stupid that they banned the hijab though.... it is clearly a violation of freedom of expression/speech like we have here in the States.
No one wants you not to enjoy your freedom. We'd like you to display a modicum of respect for those also expressing their own freedom.Trying to shut down freedom of speech, and liberals call for equality
This was already demonstrated in the early 2000's when the French President said no to an unnecessary war because the facts didn't support it.My how the world has changed, I never thought I'd see the day when the French had bigger balls than the United States.
Using fundamentalist religious views of any sort in decision making whether it being choosing to attack an embassy or start a war is fucking idiotic.The response from Römer confirmed Chirac’s worst fears—Biblical writings were influencing Bush’s decisions about war in the Middle East. A certainty of God’s will would surely blind any political leader to the evidence of man—weapons inspections would never persuade the Administration if Bush believed a clash with Iraq was being guided by God. And that sealed it—Chirac would oppose all military action. France was not going to fight a war based on an American president’s interpretation of the Bible.
Not this idiotic lie again......