Freedom is on the march in Iraq? No, but Malnutrition is!

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Expert: Malnutrition affects Iraq kids
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middle...un_iraq_kids_suffer_from_malnutrition/
GENEVA -- Malnutrition among the youngest Iraqis has almost doubled since the U.S.-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein, a hunger specialist told the U.N. human rights body Wednesday in a summary of previously reported studies on health in Iraq.

By last fall, 7.7 percent of Iraqi children under 5 suffered acute malnutrition, compared to 4 percent after Saddam's ouster in April 2003, said Jean Ziegler, the U.N. Human Rights Commission's special expert on the right to food.

Malnutrition, which is exacerbated by a lack of clean water and adequate sanitation, is a major killer of children in poor countries. Children who survive are usually physically and mentally impaired for life, and are more vulnerable to disease.

The situation facing Iraqi youngsters is "a result of the war led by coalition forces," said Ziegler, an outspoken Swiss sociology professor and former lawmaker whose previous targets have included Swiss banks, China, Brazil and Israeli treatment of Palestinians.

Overall, more than a quarter of Iraqi children don't get enough to eat, Ziegler told the 53-nation commission, which is halfway through its annual six-week session.

The U.S. delegation and other coalition countries declined to respond to his presentation, which compiled the findings of studies conducted by other specialists.

In reporting the 7.7 percent malnutrition rate for Iraqi youngsters, the Norwegian-based Fafo Institute for Applied Social Science said in November that the figure was similar to the levels in some African countries.

Iraq was generally regarded as having good nutrition rates in the 1970s and 1980s, but problems emerged when the U.N. Security Council imposed sanctions after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

The United Nations later began an oil-for-food program, which allowed Iraq to sell oil to buy food and medicine. That was credited with nearly doubling the Iraqi population's annual food intake and halving malnutrition among children.

Ziegler did not mention the role of Iraq's insurgency in the nutrition problem, something often cited by aid groups.

Late last year, Carol Bellamy, head of UNICEF, said the violence hampers the delivery of adequate supplies of food.

Ziegler also cited an October 2004 U.S. study that estimated as many as 100,000 more Iraqis -- many of them women and children -- had died since the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq than would normally have died, based on the death rate before the war.

"Most died as a result of the violence, but many others died as a result of the increasingly difficult living conditions, reflected in increasing child mortality levels," he said.

The authors of the report in the British-based medical journal The Lancet -- researchers from Johns Hopkins University, Columbia University and the Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad -- conceded their data were of "limited precision."

Ziegler also told the commission he was concerned about hunger in North Korea, Palestinian areas, Sudan's conflict-ravaged Darfur region, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar, the Philippines and Romania.

Worldwide, he said, more than 17,000 children under 5 die daily from hunger-related diseases.

"The silent daily massacre by hunger is a form of murder," Ziegler said. "It must be battled and eliminated."
17,000 children under the age of 5 die daily? And what's this administration worried about? The nutrition of one woman who did not want to be kept alive artificially.

This administration is so enamored of themselves and their ideology that they are doing way more damage than good (have they done any good?)
 

Sunbird

Golden Member
Jul 20, 2001
1,024
2
81
For all those that say US should be in Iraq or that support your troops, why don't you use your money to feed the Iraqis. Send them lots of care packages, the government is feeding the soldiers and caring for their needs.

Brings up that old question, is it better to die of hunger in a democracy, or life with a reasonably full tummy in a authoratarian state?
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Sunbird
For all those that say US should be in Iraq or that support your troops, why don't you use your money to feed the Iraqis. Send them lots of care packages, the government is feeding the soldiers and caring for their needs.

Brings up that old question, is it better to die of hunger in a democracy, or life with a reasonably full tummy in a authoratarian state?

Don't give the right-wing lunatics any ideas.
 

Sunbird

Golden Member
Jul 20, 2001
1,024
2
81
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Sunbird
For all those that say US should be in Iraq or that support your troops, why don't you use your money to feed the Iraqis. Send them lots of care packages, the government is feeding the soldiers and caring for their needs.

Brings up that old question, is it better to die of hunger in a democracy, or life with a reasonably full tummy in a authoratarian state?

Don't give the right-wing lunatics any ideas.

Your may be right, but since I don't know what your talking about I have to ask:

What ideas could this give the right-wing lunatics?

And what is a right-wing lunatic?
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Sunbird
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Sunbird
For all those that say US should be in Iraq or that support your troops, why don't you use your money to feed the Iraqis. Send them lots of care packages, the government is feeding the soldiers and caring for their needs.

Brings up that old question, is it better to die of hunger in a democracy, or life with a reasonably full tummy in a authoratarian state?

Don't give the right-wing lunatics any ideas.

Your may be right, but since I don't know what your talking about I have to ask:

What ideas could this give the right-wing lunatics?

And what is a right-wing lunatic?

This attempt at thwarting the power of the judicial branch brings the executive and legislative branches one step closer to overthrowing the Constitution.

The full tummy comment is one that said overthrow would leave the country in the control of the right-wing extremists (Delay, Frist, Bush, Wolfowitz, the Fundies, etc.). It's not really an idea, but a resultant of events over the last 5 years. It IS there goal to do this, if not in such an overt way, but it IS there goal.

Said names listed above are the "lunatics".
 

Insomniak

Banned
Sep 11, 2003
4,836
0
0
This is so stupid. People are complaining about Iraq, butcha know what some of the malnutrition rates in some African countries are?

Listen, if you want to work on the problem, fine, work on the problem, but don't just focus on the one portion of it that gets you political advantage. Solve the whole thing or nothing at all.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Insomniak
This is so stupid. People are complaining about Iraq, butcha know what some of the malnutrition rates in some African countries are?

Listen, if you want to work on the problem, fine, work on the problem, but don't just focus on the one portion of it that gets you political advantage. Solve the whole thing or nothing at all.

Did you not see this part that was bolded?
In reporting the 7.7 percent malnutrition rate for Iraqi youngsters, the Norwegian-based Fafo Institute for Applied Social Science said in November that the figure was similar to the levels in some African countries.
The Propagandist is responsible for this increase!