• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

freedb is awesome

I'm sorry,but foobar sucks for general use.

It is however a feature rich piece of quality software. It is definitely capable, but NOT user or time friendly.

I WILL spend time ripping and catalogging..but even that is pushing it.

with wmp9 and lossless, i am fine..evne if i do NOT have kernel streaming...never head the difference anyways....at least that I can clearly remember
 
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
I'm sorry,but foobar sucks for general use.

It is however a feature rich piece of quality software. It is definitely capable, but NOT user or time friendly.

I WILL spend time ripping and catalogging..but even that is pushing it.

with wmp9 and lossless, i am fine..evne if i do NOT have kernel streaming...never head the difference anyways....at least that I can clearly remember
Click to expand...

its uncluttered, well documented, has a great userbase, and the developers work with the userbase. i don't see how you could think it isn't user friendly, it installs easily and dosen't have all kinds of flashy blinking boxes and other crap to clutter the interface.
 
Originally posted by: fivespeed5
musicbrainz.org is better
Click to expand...

It missed on entirely too many of my songs. I had rock songs being renamed and id3 tagged as classical songs.
 
the ability to mass retag files / albums from FREEDB and foobar is awesome.

i love foobar. Even when i introduced it to the casual mp3 listener, it won hands down to winamp.

the myth of not user friendly is crazy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top