Good choices, although last I knew Avast is chatty about upgrading to paid versions and required re-registering (free key via e-mail) annually which is annoying. Also the Avira free version downloads the entire program size in order to update instead of just the definition package and their servers were pretty slow in Germany. Comodo Internet Security is another of my favorite freebies.I would suggest Avast or Avira. I use Avast on any system that doesn't have paid AV.
Good choices, although last I knew Avast is chatty about upgrading to paid versions and required re-registering (free key via e-mail) annually which is annoying. Also the Avira free version downloads the entire program size in order to update instead of just the definition package and their servers were pretty slow in Germany. Comodo Internet Security is another of my favorite freebies.
Do you need just the AV or Firewall or Both?
FYI they are extending it
http://arstechnica.com/information-...tials-for-windows-xp-gets-a-15-month-reprieve
But not patches for the OS itself. Which makes very little sense. It's still DOA as of April 8th, so I'm not sure what purpose extending support for MSE provides.FYI they are extending it
http://arstechnica.com/information-...tials-for-windows-xp-gets-a-15-month-reprieve
But not patches for the OS itself. Which makes very little sense. It's still DOA as of April 8th, so I'm not sure what purpose extending support for MSE provides.
I've used AVG and Avast, happy with both
But not patches for the OS itself. Which makes very little sense. It's still DOA as of April 8th, so I'm not sure what purpose extending support for MSE provides.
My guess is this -
Maybe if in the case you absolutely have to keep XP or cannot upgrade, at least you will have up to date virus defs? It is a bit more security I guess?
Maybe they will release a statement about it.
I have decided to return one of my pcs back to a windows xp professional computer so i will be using Kaspersky Internet Security 2014 and Firefox.