JohnOfSheffield
Lifer
- Jun 26, 2007
- 11,925
- 2
- 0
I am not eliminating anyone. I am preventing poor women from extorting society for money to support their poor life choices. No one is being eliminated.
And yeah I think eliminating crime fits into that whole public safety thing.
I removed all the irrelevant crap out of your post and now i'm left with this horseshit that i don't want to respond to either... I feel like i'm enabling a help seeking anorexic little girl in an obese idiots body.
1. Elimination by means of hindered procreation, perhaps you don't get this but Hitler at least knew what he was advocating.
All poor people are criminals, all of the offspring of poor people will become criminals.
If you agree with that then yeah, you have a point in your deranged mind but that point isn't in reality, only in your own deranged mind.
Your argument would work for banning anything, i once cut my finger on paper, ban paper for public safety concerns....
You don't understand the simplest things such as "direct threat" even after i have explained them to you...
I can't have a discussion with a man who has the IQ of a five year old child with parkinsons. It is impossible to argue with you because you don't even understand your own arguments much less mine.