Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You think that they are not doing enough in condemming these scandals? The WSJ has been the one to expose many of them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must be kidding. The WSJ spent 1996-2000 as head cheerleader. The OpEd page is the epitome of the "take everything but the light fixtures" ethos.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about right now. I admit I did not read the WSJ as much 4 years ago as I do now, but they are extremely aggresive in their reporting now. You are aware that they won a pulitzer prize in 2003 for for explanatory reporting on the corporate scandals?
You must not read it as much as you think.
Talking about scandals in 2003 is soooo noteworthy. I bet the WSJ is the sole daily on the entire planet writing articles about corruption in America. I stopped reading the WSJ (on a daily basis) when I left home for school. After college I transitioned to IBD but in my current life they are worth little more than a skim at the newsstand.
As for my comment on the OpEd page ethos . . . I'm talking about more than corporate scandals. You must not read it as much as you think.
