FPSRussia on youtube. You guys ever see this guy with his toys?

[tboo]

I love these videos. Is the dude really Russian or is it all an act?

 

[Farmer]

Prey tell what is stopping him or someone else who owns one of these monstrosities from shelling a local elementary school full of children.

I don't know, human decency?

Calm down before you give your pea-sized brain an aneurysm.

Most of what he shoots, like the 40mm auto grenade launcher is Title II NFA regulated. You can't just goto Wal-Mart and buy one. He is probably friends with a firearm manufacturer.

 

[Sixguns]

He knows the laws. Awhile back he was going to do a balistic knife but when researching it found out its illegal to use in the US.

 

[WelshBloke]

Guy need to get hold of one of those super slow motion cameras.

Shit getting shot or blown up always looks better in ultra slow mo.

 

[CVSiN]

HOW FUCK IS THAT LEGAL IN THE U.S. I watched a bunch of his videos and full of guns that should be banned, but nothing takes the cake like the so called machine gun that he rides on.

why wouldn't it be legal?
we have the right to bear arms..

and you can own anything you want with the right license.

Thank goodness for the NRA and the right to bear arms..

You can have my weapons when you pry them from my dead hands..

 

[JimmiG]

Your ameripussy "guns" are just toys compared to some of the stuff that's laying around in the former soviet satellite states But you can keep playing with your toys if you enjoy that.

 

[Farmer]

ameripussy

You're so creative.

 

[WelshBloke]

He knows the laws. Awhile back he was going to do a balistic knife but when researching it found out its illegal to use in the US.

Thats quite amusing considering what he's shooting in the op.

 

[Sixguns]

I know right, you cant shoot a knife but you can shoot a 40mm cannon. Or even the mortar he tried.

 

[darkswordsman17]

http://www.youtube.com/user/FPSRussia#p/u/0/UcN7w_gh7uY

The slow-mo head nod @ ~2:05 is awesome.

 

[pontifex]

How do we know he isn't mentally instable or disturbed. He could just snap one day and take this to a local park full of children and have at it.

so could anyone with box of steak knives, or a baseball bat, or a car.

also, based on your spelling, it seems like you have no problem staying away from schools.

 

[Farmer]

How do we know he isn't mentally instable or disturbed. He could just snap one day and take this to a local park full of children and have at it.

So you're arguing for improved mental health standards?

You know, people killed each other just fine before guns were invented.

 

[AMDZen]

I assume that is is legal, but it shouldn't be. Please tell me what legitimate purpose could such a weapon have.

I really hope shit like this is banned in California.

Your definition of what is legitimate or not is irrelevant. The purpose it served in this video is legitimate enough, having fun.

 

[WelshBloke]

So you're arguing for improved mental health standards?

You know, people killed each other just fine before guns were invented.

I was about to say "but with less awesomeness" but then a vision of a medieval calvery charge buy fully armoured knights flashed though my head and I changed my mind.

You should ban horses and heavy metal objects.

 

[DominionSeraph]

Fake.

Look at the barrel rise in every single shot, yet the shot of the target shows them all landing in the vicinity.
That mannequin is also rigged to blow.

 

[AMDZen]

Prey tell what is stopping him or someone else who owns one of these monstrosities from shelling a local elementary school full of children.

How about the fact that its never happened? Gatling guns have been around since the civil war, and any civilian that has owned one has never done this.

Whats funny is that in the UK, you can't own a hand gun at all, any where (shot guns have some exceptions) and yet you can own a tank.

At least our laws are consistent.

 

[AMDZen]

Fake.

Look at the barrel rise in every single shot, yet the shot of the target shows them all landing in the vicinity.
That mannequin is also rigged to blow.

What is he firing then, blanks?

 

[WelshBloke]

How about the fact that its never happened? Gatling guns have been around since the civil war, and any civilian that has owned one has never done this.

Whats funny is that in the UK, you can't own a hand gun at all, any where (shot guns have some exceptions) and yet you can own a tank.

At least our laws are consistent.

Yeah you can if the gun is deactivated. Its just a vehicle then, admittedly an awesome one, but still just a vehicle.

Also how is a tank in anyway a handgun

 

[AMDZen]

Yeah you can if the gun is deactivated. Its just a vehicle then, admittedly an awesome one, but still just a vehicle.

Also how is a tank in anyway a handgun

It has to be de-militarized, but can be re-militarized with just a couple parts you can order from countless places in countless countries and get them in no problem.

Its as laughable as saying you can own an AR-15 but not an M-4 when it takes two parts to make it fully automatic. Which are not illegal to buy. You can buy the semi AR-15, and the parts to make it fully automatic both completely legally but you can't buy them together? Funny that people use the latter argument only when it suits them.

 

[davmat787]

Prey tell what is stopping him or someone else who owns one of these monstrosities from shelling a local elementary school full of children.

The same thing that stops one from driving their car through a group of elementary school children.

The statistics regarding guns has been beaten to death, even in the relatively short time I have been actively posting. So there is no use in bringing them up again to show you how ignorant you are in regards to legal gun ownership.

And besides, as he likes to say, he is a Professional Russian.

 

[WelshBloke]

It has to be de-militarized, but can be re-militarized with just a couple parts you can order from countless places in countless countries and get them in no problem.

Its as laughable as saying you can own an AR-15 but not an M-4 when it takes two parts to make it fully automatic. Which are not illegal to buy. You can buy the semi AR-15, and the parts to make it fully automatic both completely legally but you can't buy them together? Funny that people use the latter argument only when it suits them.

I'm not sure what argument your trying to make here.

That a fake Russian guy in the US should be allowed to fire an anti air gun because in the UK you can buy a demilitarised tank that you can re militarise and this somehow is a bit like a handgun?

 

[AMDZen]

I'm not sure what argument your trying to make here.

That a fake Russian guy in the US should be allowed to fire an anti air gun because in the UK you can buy a demilitarised tank that you can re militarise and this somehow is a bit like a handgun?

What are you, neckbeards best friend? My argument is that we're consistent, how do you not get that? Trying to point out how stupid you are across the pond, and how this DCal guy belongs in your idiot country.

By the UK's logic, owning a tank is legal as long as you can't fire its gun - so a hand gun should be legal too if the firing pin has been removed, right? Its the same thing. So why isn't it? Because you guys are conveniently inconsistent about shit like that.

 

[Farmer]

Its as laughable as saying you can own an AR-15 but not an M-4 when it takes two parts to make it fully automatic. Which are not illegal to buy. You can buy the semi AR-15, and the parts to make it fully automatic both completely legally but you can't buy them together? Funny that people use the latter argument only when it suits them.

Meh, I mean it's a grandfather clause/legal technicality. BATF only started regulating DIAS (the part you're talking about) in 1981, so it only required NFA-like registration of post-1981 DIAS transfers, otherwise it'd be an ex post facto regulation.

People already owned pre-81 DIAS, so the only legal way to regulate is to regulate the use of such DIAS in ARs. The DIAS was "new technology" and its regulation was reactionary, which is not uncommon at all in US firearm law.

 

[WelshBloke]

What are you, neckbeards best friend? My argument is that we're consistent, how do you not get that? Trying to point out how stupid you are across the pond, and how this DCal guy belongs in your idiot country.

By the UK's logic, owning a tank is legal as long as you can't fire its gun - so a hand gun should be legal too if the firing pin has been removed, right? Its the same thing. So why isn't it? Because you guys are conveniently inconsistent about shit like that.

It is (well deactivating them takes a bit more than removing the fireing pin but thats the same as the tank).

If your consistent how come the ballistic knife is illegal and the AA gun is?

Also WTF has the UK got to do with this thread.

And more importantly where did you get all the sand from that appears to be lodged in your vagina?

 

[JulesMaximus]

Heavy is reliable...