• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FPS vs Response time

videogames101

Diamond Member
I was thinking. Say I have a monitor with a 8 ms response time, and lets say I'm playing BF2 and I'm pulling 50 fps. Now, 50 fps means every 2 ms there is a new frame. Is that correct? If so, how could a 8 ms response time monitor possibly show a frame every 2 ms? The way I see it, a 8 ms response time would only let you see 12.5 fps. Am I missing something here????
 
1000 divided by 8 = 125

FYI, that 8 milliseconds (1 millisecond = 1/1000 second) is to go from gray to white to gray.
 
Originally posted by: videogames101
I was thinking. Say I have a monitor with a 8 ms response time, and lets say I'm playing BF2 and I'm pulling 50 fps. Now, 50 fps means every 2 ms there is a new frame. Is that correct? If so, how could a 8 ms response time monitor possibly show a frame every 2 ms? The way I see it, a 8 ms response time would only let you see 12.5 fps. Am I missing something here????

Yes. Your maths is wrong. 50FPS = 1000/50 = 20ms. 16ms is effectively 60FPS.
 
Back
Top