http://www.cluboc.net/reviews/motherboards/foxconn/Winfastnf4/index.htm
Basically, they flesh out what I have been saying here.
1. Highly stable.
2. Crappy overclocker.
So, if you don't care about overclocking, this is a good board to get! This makes the fifth review of this board.
Although they indicated that the board was a "tad" slower than other nForce4 boards they have reviewed, they did not put up benchmarks to prove this. I have seen some other reviews that showed this board to be just as fast as any other nForce4 board. Here are some other review links:
http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=756
http://www.ocworkbench.com/2005/foxconn/winfast%20NF4UK8AA/g1.htm
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/mainboards/display/foxconn-nf4u.html
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q1/foxconn-nf4uk8aa/index.x?pg=1
Basically, they flesh out what I have been saying here.
1. Highly stable.
2. Crappy overclocker.
So, if you don't care about overclocking, this is a good board to get! This makes the fifth review of this board.
Although they indicated that the board was a "tad" slower than other nForce4 boards they have reviewed, they did not put up benchmarks to prove this. I have seen some other reviews that showed this board to be just as fast as any other nForce4 board. Here are some other review links:
http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=756
http://www.ocworkbench.com/2005/foxconn/winfast%20NF4UK8AA/g1.htm
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/mainboards/display/foxconn-nf4u.html
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q1/foxconn-nf4uk8aa/index.x?pg=1
Facebook
Twitter