FOX News meltdown when criticism by guest leveled against the extravagant inauguration

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
let me state some facts:
Saddam had meet with Al Qeade personal before
Known terrorist were in Iraq (and still are)

meeting with people at one point in time means you associate with them? you know, america did a lot more than just meet with osama...

and there are probably more terrorists in iraq than there were before the war now


Saddam was a jacked up, mental, lunatic dictator, killed millions, ignored the UN, bribed the french, and actaully made the world think he had WMD's.... on purpose...so he needed to come down, and the world is , and especially the middle east, a safer place with him gone.... and the place will get better...

wait, are we talking about saddam or bush here? :laugh:
 

gopunk

Lifer
Jul 7, 2001
29,239
2
0
Originally posted by: Deptacon
I know everyone has thier opinions, and thats cool, its when people just make dumb uneducated ignorant comments, like, no war for oil, and bush lies, that just ticks me off

bush didn;t lie, he was givin intel and went on it...thwe same intel the french, the germans, the brits, and the russians had.... the intel was wrong...oh HE IS A LIAR, cause he is not a TREE HUGGIN HIPPIE...he is a liar....ok...heheh that was an ignorant low liberal blow.... but...anyways

if the french, the germans, and the russians all had that intel, why was britain the only country in that group to support us?
 

Deptacon

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2004
2,282
1
81
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Deptacon
I know everyone has thier opinions, and thats cool, its when people just make dumb uneducated ignorant comments, like, no war for oil, and bush lies, that just ticks me off

bush didn;t lie, he was givin intel and went on it...thwe same intel the french, the germans, the brits, and the russians had.... the intel was wrong...oh HE IS A LIAR, cause he is not a TREE HUGGIN HIPPIE...he is a liar....ok...heheh that was an ignorant low liberal blow.... but...anyways

if the french, the germans, and the russians all had that intel, why was britain the only country in that group to support us?

casue the french had 2 billion dollars of illegal money invested in iraq, and they knew they wouldnt get it back....
 

Deptacon

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2004
2,282
1
81
Originally posted by: gopunk
let me state some facts:
Saddam had meet with Al Qeade personal before
Known terrorist were in Iraq (and still are)

meeting with people at one point in time means you associate with them? you know, america did a lot more than just meet with osama...

and there are probably more terrorists in iraq than there were before the war now


Saddam was a jacked up, mental, lunatic dictator, killed millions, ignored the UN, bribed the french, and actaully made the world think he had WMD's.... on purpose...so he needed to come down, and the world is , and especially the middle east, a safer place with him gone.... and the place will get better...

wait, are we talking about saddam or bush here? :laugh:


yeah there are more there now, right next to our boys so they can take 2 right between the eyes.....
and the bush comment.. we don't need a permission slip from the UN tpo do anything.... so dont go there...

bush aint perfect... but he is doin what he said he would do, and stickin to it

 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Deptacon
I know everyone has thier opinions, and thats cool, its when people just make dumb uneducated ignorant comments, like, no war for oil, and bush lies, that just ticks me off

bush didn;t lie, he was givin intel and went on it...thwe same intel the french, the germans, the brits, and the russians had.... the intel was wrong...oh HE IS A LIAR, cause he is not a TREE HUGGIN HIPPIE...he is a liar....ok...heheh that was an ignorant low liberal blow.... but...anyways

So I guess if we think that this war was a sham, then we're supposed to sit back and STFU (as you suggested). Sorry, doesn't work that way. Soldier or not, you're not changing my mind on this subject PERIOD. Show me a big ole pile of WMD's that threatened us (reason we were given for invading) and I'll eat my crow. Until then, I'll crow about the war until I get tired of doing it.

And the longer it goes on, the closer it becomes GW's personal vietnam. Too bad he had an exit stragegy for Vietnam and not one for Iraq.

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Extravagant certainly describes the Kerry victory area in Boston that went unused. Did you see that and that was only for his victory speech. That was a true waste of money!
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Deptacon

bush aint perfect... but he is doin what he said he would do, and stickin to it

Pft. How wonderful. He is an idoit that sticks to his guns which is right on par with most of his base.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Condor
Extravagant certainly describes the Kerry victory area in Boston that went unused. Did you see that and that was only for his victory speech. That was a true waste of money!

:cookie:
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Deptacon

let me state some facts:
Saddam had meet with Al Qeade personal before
Known terrorist were in Iraq (and still are)
he broke 11 UN resolutions

When did he meet with with them?

Also, last I read, the "known terrorists" in Iraq were in no-fly zones.
 

Deptacon

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2004
2,282
1
81
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard..... 90% of soldiers are republicans....

republicans always rais the defesne budget and benifits when they are in power...

always vote for better equipment, always do everything thats in the best interestes of the troops and the military

 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard..... 90% of soldiers are republicans....

republicans always rais the defesne budget and benifits when they are in power...

always vote for better equipment, always do everything thats in the best interestes of the troops and the military

That is truly laughable considering the position the Republicans have put the soldiers in.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard..... 90% of soldiers are republicans....

republicans always rais the defesne budget and benifits when they are in power...

always vote for better equipment, always do everything thats in the best interestes of the troops and the military
Might want to check into Dick Cheney's thoughts on eliminating weapons programs and vehicles during the 90s. Might also want to check into the Bush admin's lowering of benefits recently for veterans.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard..... 90% of soldiers are republicans....

republicans always rais the defesne budget and benifits when they are in power...

always vote for better equipment, always do everything thats in the best interestes of the troops and the military
Might want to check into Dick Cheney's thoughts on eliminating weapons programs and vehicles during the 90s. Might also want to check into the Bush admin's lowering of benefits recently for veterans.

Shhh... you might crack the brainwashing....
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Crimson
Red, you are just making yourself look foolish now. Explain to me which people who are currently in Iraq could not have chosen NOT to be there?
Easy.

Anyone who enlisted in time before the war to be deployed to Iraq.
Umm.. no.. Anyone who joins the military is well aware they can be sent into a war zone.. If they did not want to risk that, they should not have joined in the first place. If they would have CHOSEN not to join, they would not be in Iraq.
They (safely) assume they could be sent into a war zone for just reasons.


are you in the military or ever were, im assuming not, so with that STFU, if you have, i apolgize, and you have more right than anyone else to say whatever you like....
Uh-oh...we have ourselves a brand-new e-thug.

All hail Deptacon, king of n00b e-thugs!
 

ajf3

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 2000
2,566
0
76
Pluuze... Why do you think we're fighting the war? Is it not to protect our way of life? By not having a grand inaguration, we'd be giving in to terror - exactly what they want. Personally, I feel this is just another case of the libs looking for anything to complain about in regards to Bush.

Anyway - when Clinton has his, there were HOMELESS American CHILDREN STARVING in the STREETS... oh, the horror of it! There will always be something better to spend your money on - you can't stop living life.

 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: ajf3
Pluuze... Why do you think we're fighting the war? Is it not to protect our way of life? By not having a grand inaguration, we'd be giving in to terror - exactly what they want. Personally, I feel this is just another case of the libs looking for anything to complain about in regards to Bush.

Anyway - when Clinton has his, there were HOMELESS American CHILDREN STARVING in the STREETS... oh, the horror of it! There will always be something better to spend your money on - you can't stop living life.

Wow, back to the "we'd be giving in to terror" argument.... how original.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: ajf3
Pluuze... Why do you think we're fighting the war? Is it not to protect our way of life? By not having a grand inaguration, we'd be giving in to terror - exactly what they want. Personally, I feel this is just another case of the libs looking for anything to complain about in regards to Bush.

Anyway - when Clinton has his, there were HOMELESS American CHILDREN STARVING in the STREETS... oh, the horror of it! There will always be something better to spend your money on - you can't stop living life.
:cookie:
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

Most of the troops are republicans! That just may be because the left aren't real believers in principle, but in keeping their sorry butts safe at home.

 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

Most of the troops are republicans! That just may be because the left aren't real believers in principle, but in keeping their sorry butts safe at home.

Hmm... I was for the war in Afghanistan, but not in Iraq. Boy, my priorities are screwed up. :roll:
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
My assessment:

Republicans are for the war, but don't support the troops.

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard..... 90% of soldiers are republicans....

republicans always rais the defesne budget and benifits when they are in power...

always vote for better equipment, always do everything thats in the best interestes of the troops and the military

That is truly laughable considering the position the Republicans have put the soldiers in.

No sh!t. You are losing any credibility you may have established here Deptacon. LMAO.

Edit: After re-reading some of your posts, I am convinced that you are a parody poster. Think we already have enough of those, don't you?