hal2kilo
Lifer
- Feb 24, 2009
- 24,146
- 10,833
- 136
The "max white votes" strategy is one that the Republicans will play at their peril.
the percentage of white voters in Presidential elections has dropped steadily in every election since 1976 saved one.
Democrats have over that time averaged ~40% of the votes among white voters. Obama got 43% of the white votes in 2008 and 39% in 2012. He may win 10% of the whites in Mississippi but well over 50% of the white voters in places with few minorities such as New Hampshire or Vermont.
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/...white-voters-on-par-with-other-democrats?lite
the issues isn't the percentage of white voters, it is where the votes are coming from. The election is determined in 51 separate elections and only closely contested in the battleground states. Who cares if Republicans get 95% of the white votes in Alabama/Tennessee/Texas instead of 90%. The Republicans will need to concentrate their efforts in the industrial rustbelt and midwest i.e. OH, IA, WI, PA, MI without energizing the minority votes. The problem is that battleground states such as OH, VA, FL, CO, PA, etc all have growing or sizable minority populations. The Republicans will need to continue to get more and more of the white votes in those states as the percentage of white voters decline as a percentage of the electorate. In 2004, Bush was able get 58% of the white votes in part by driving conservative voters to the poll with wedge issue i.e. gay marriage bans in many battle ground states. In 2016, if the percentage of white votes declines to 70% from 72%, Bush's 2004 numbers would not be enough for Republicans to win.
Which brings up a good point. What are they going to use as a wedge issue this time around? Constitutional ammendment to get the ssm issue back to the states?
