Fox News complaining mastermind behind Benghazi attack captured.

Status
Not open for further replies.

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,646
33,233
136
So Fox News justifies its massive amounts of Benghazi coverage because they "want to get to the truth behind the attacks"

Fox News reaction and other right wing bitching...
Told about the Benghazi attacker’s capture in Libya, one Fox News host said, “Good news there … I guess.”
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/good-news-i-guess


More Fox News complaining...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/...y-clinton-benghazi-outnumbered_n_5503865.html

Again remind me what was behind all of the virtual non-stop Fox News coverage of Benghazi??
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,667
17,273
136
"It's not news. It's Fox."

Yes "fox" as in cunning and stocking its prey. "Prey", of course, refers to the idiots that not only watch fox but the idiots that then go and spread the talking points they just heard.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
Yes "fox" as in cunning and stocking its prey. "Prey", of course, refers to the idiots that not only watch fox but the idiots that then go and spread the talking points they just heard.

You just can't handle anything outside your LMSM bubble. This is 'murrica. We believe in the Bible and the purity of the Republican party here. We don't need none of your fancy book talk, we knows what we believes.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
Shens. Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the man responsible, was arrested September 15th, 2012. That put a damper on his video productions and probably saved many lives.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
I imagine the program directors of this "news" channel are locked in a room somewhere, covered in their own feces screaming like apes and rolling around the floor - and at some point some how, they give the direction to push stories like this.

This is why I don't take 'conservatives' in this country seriously; because your views are fucking crazy.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
Hahaha.. all good points they make in this article:

1. This is about Clinton’s book tour. It’s hard to know how to respond to such obvious nonsense, but to believe that U.S. Special Forces, the FBI, and the White House hatched a military mission, months in the making, to help a former cabinet official on a book tour seems rather delusional.

2. This is about the IRS “controversy.” Apparently, capturing terrorists is now part of a plot to distract attention away from a story that evaporated a year ago?

3. Obama was golfing when the suspect was captured. I’m not sure if the claim is true, but if it is, I’m not sure why anyone should care. The president ordered the mission; American personnel on the ground carried out the mission. Why would anyone care about Obama’s physical location when the suspect was taken away?

4. Obama should put Ahmed Abu Khattala in Guantanamo. This gem, pushed by Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, argues that the terrorist suspect shouldn’t be tried in courts with a great track record for convicting and imprisoning terrorists. (Wasn’t McCain the guy who, in 2008, said the United States needs to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay? Does McCain even remember his own position?) Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy, after hearing about McCain’s and Graham’s appeal, was quoted as saying,”Oh for God’s sake…” which seems like the appropriate reaction.

5. Obama waited for the “perfect political opportunity.” This line, rolled out by former Rep. Joe Walsh (R-Ill.), seems especially bizarre given that it’s easy to think of plenty of other politically opportune moments to capture Abu Khattala. Indeed, there’s nothing particularly interesting or important about right now.

6. Nothing to see here; move along. Told about the Benghazi attacker’s capture in Libya, one Fox News host said, “Good news there … I guess.” Drudge is pretending this is largely meaningless, too. The moral of the story: ridiculous Benghazi conspiracy theories are huge news, while successful counter-terrorism missions in Benghazi are ho-hum.

7. This took too long. There’s a lot of “Obama was too slow” commentary this afternoon. Funny, five full years after 9/11, George W. Bush said he didn’t even much care about catching bin Laden – ever. Where were the conservative complaints then? The truth is, these missions abroad aren’t easy and they take time. A win is a win, no matter how long it takes.

8. Don’t Mirandize! Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) responded to the developments with a statement that read, “Rather than rushing to read him his Miranda rights and telling him he has the right to remain silent, I hope the administration will focus on collecting the intelligence necessary to prevent future attacks and to find other terrorists responsible for the Benghazi attacks.” For the record, Bush/Cheney routinely Mirandized terrorist suspects in U.S. custody, which GOP lawmakers never found troubling until after Jan. 20, 2009.

9. Only one? House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) issued a statement saying Abu Khatallah is but “one of dozens, if not hundreds of individuals, involved in the murder of four Americans in Benghazi.” Perhaps, though Khatallah is believed to have been a ringleader of the attack, and other suspects are likely to be taken into custody, too.

10. We could have had Abu Khattala sooner. The accused has been the principal suspect for quite a while, but in reality, a previous mission “postponed because of violent uprisings against the Libyan government.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.