jackstar7
Lifer
- Jun 26, 2009
- 11,679
- 1,944
- 126
It was a tacky video but facts are facts. And the stats are accurate.
And are they... attributable to Obama directly?
It was a tacky video but facts are facts. And the stats are accurate.
Who the hell knows, but he's is the prez and therefore the majority of the people and the media will blame him. Me, I blame the people for most of the shit in the US.And are they... attributable to Obama directly?
Yeah, I saw it. It did look like a campaign ad.
But what's new?
Watch Sean Hannity and it's 60 minutes of all Obama and why you shouldn't vote for him. Then watch Chris Matthews, it's 60 minutes about Romney and why you shouldn't vote for him.
There ARE real news shows out there. But Fox and Friends isn't one. Neither are Matthews or Hannity.
Fern
It was a tacky video but facts are facts. And the stats are accurate.
Fox News’ Executive Vice President of Programming, Bill Shine, tells Yahoo News, “The package that aired on ‘Fox & Friends’ was created by an associate producer and was not authorized at the senior executive level of the network.”
Of course it was full of lies, duh, its the media.Except for the fact that it was full of lies:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jZMQnHRwjiHgNBnK3hfWq5_eTHpHgO0WgNHfd0_pO74/edit?pli=1
It was a tacky video but facts are facts. And the stats are accurate.
Do you mean that it feels truthy?
Can you provide evidence that the stated 'facts' were incorrect? Serious question.
And I've seen plenty of cases on other networks where they spend several minutes on a Dem and then show maybe 10-30 seconds on 'stock footage' on the Rep. All mainstream media is biased.
And here's Fern with the false equivalence. Give me a break. Fox doesn't have any real shows period.
I don't have to provide the evidence, as Phokus already did:
https://docs.google.com/presentatio...gNHfd0_pO74/edit?pli=1#slide=id.g5afb8ae_0_26
He's a big liberal surrounded by staunch conservatives at election time, just him, Gretta and Garaldo. Imagine you were under contract to the Sean Hannity Show . . .Poor Shep Smith. That guy is aging like he is a president.
Which one?
Pick your fraud there are over 400 pages of documented fraud,distortion and outright lies.
http://mediamatters.org/
He's a big liberal surrounded by staunch conservatives at election time, just him, Gretta and Garaldo. Imagine you were under contract to the Sean Hannity Show . . .
He's not a foaming lunatic, but he's pretty solidly left. He'd fit in at ABC/CBS/CNN/NBC - probably not at MCNBC, he could be the token conservative there. Imagine, say, Woolfe, surrounded by Spideys. Or, well, me.He's considered a big liberal?
He IS an entertaining, no-bullshit guy. Lots of liberals are. Being liberal doesn't have to make one a foaming idiot. YOU are liberal; I don't consider you bad. We all have our biases and beliefs, and classical liberalism is a beautiful belief system.Interesting. The admittedly few times I've watched the whole hour with him he basically struck me as an entertaining guy and alternately a no-bullshit guy.
But after a quick poke around the interwebs it seems either he changed, or his audience did after Katrina. Interesting to me that there's an event tied to this perception change.