found my zombie apocalypse weapon.....

[mcveigh]

http://youtu.be/BM-DGaNmtA0
http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2012/03/10/double-barrel-1911/

double .45's, :thumbsup:

the only thing more awesome than this would be to use it in a gunfight on top of a runaway train with Burt Reynolds as my getaway driver.
</archer>

now, to get an axe as my backup....

 

[DaveSimmons]

John Woo and Chow Yun-Fat need to make a new movie together. Quad-wielding .45s!

 

[Matthiasa]

So basically two pistols glued together...
If something is large enough or armored enough to need more then a pistol using two of them will not make it more effective.
Unless the protection is right at its exact limit anyways.

 

[brainhulk]

i wonder if the "you move like they do" scene in the matrix would have been different if Neo was shot with one of these things

 

[Doppel]

Worthless for practical use, but very cool. Some practical use could be had if it had just the one trigger on the right and some mechanism by which it goes through the clip on the right first and then when finished the clip on the left, thereby doubling capacity of the gun without need for an extra long clip.

 

[jruchko]

Worthless for practical use, but very cool. Some practical use could be had if it had just the one trigger on the right and some mechanism by which it goes through the clip on the right first and then when finished the clip on the left, thereby doubling capacity of the gun without need for an extra long clip.

Why have the second barrel at all then?

 

[brainhulk]

actually i would rather have multiple bullets inside a single shell fired from a single barrel

:hmm:

 

[arcenite]

actually i would rather have multiple bullets inside a single shell fired from a single barrel

:hmm:

Why not multiple bullets from TWO shells fired from TWO barrels?

:hmm:

 

[pontifex]

this thing is so stupid, lol.


i bet its heavier than hell and impossible to grip properly. also, is the ejector and extractor of the "gun" on the left swapped to the other side? it has to be as it would be ejecting right into the right "gun".

 

[brainhulk]

Why not multiple bullets from TWO shells fired from TWO barrels?

:hmm:

and then make it full-auto instead of this semi-auto crap

:hmm:

 

[dawp]

actually i would rather have multiple bullets inside a single shell fired from a single barrel

:hmm:

what you need is a metal storm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKlnMwuCZso

 

[KoolAidKid]

Here's mine.

 

[marvdmartian]

So, basically, a double-tap with one trigger pull? Can't imagine what the kick of this would be, though.

 

[SpatiallyAware]

So, basically, a double-tap with one trigger pull? Can't imagine what the kick of this would be, though.

Since it's twice the weight it would probably not be that bad.


A cool concept, but limited use. Still neat to see a company make something like that.

 

[Bartman39]

Must weigh a ton and kinda interesting concept...

But this is much sexier...:biggrin: And more effective at long or short range...

 

[HybridSquirrel]

Must weigh a ton and kinda interesting concept...

But this is much sexier...:biggrin: And more effective at long or short range...

for the price you'd spend on one of those, you can get a glock 17, 10, 33 round mags and thousands of rounds of ammo.

 

[BladeVenom]

 

[waggy]

Here's mine.

screw that. i will just build the zombie proof house

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajWCXdRwhDA

 

[gorcorps]

Worthless for practical use, but very cool. Some practical use could be had if it had just the one trigger on the right and some mechanism by which it goes through the clip on the right first and then when finished the clip on the left, thereby doubling capacity of the gun without need for an extra long clip.

So you just want a double stack 1911? They already have those.

 

[HybridSquirrel]

=D

 

[HAL9000]

CCW? :awe:

 

[mcveigh]

CCW? :awe:

not for zombies.....you need this.

 

[DAGTA]

ultimate zombie weapon: maggots

 

[Bartman39]

for the price you'd spend on one of those, you can get a glock 17, 10, 33 round mags and thousands of rounds of ammo.

Again not near as sexy and you would get owned before you got within 300 yards... Glock I think not (well possibly if you used like a mortar)...

Oh and there is a fix for the shell difference... (20+10=30)
Check the ballistics its a rifle disguised as a hand gun...

 

[HybridSquirrel]

Again not near as sexy and you would get owned before you got within 300 yards... Glock I think not (well possibly if you used like a mortar)...

Oh and there is a fix for the shell difference... (20+10=30)
Check the ballistics its a rifle in a hand gun clothes...

you are still spending way too much money on the gun and then rounds....for something that shoots a .22