Originally posted by: bR
Originally posted by: everman
Originally posted by: bR
Originally posted by: everman
I don't know much about F1, so why are they switching? I'd think that you would want to stick with one engine type so you can continue to improve upon it? Or do they switch every so many years for the sake of competition?
The governing body supposedly want to reduce costs, curb down the speed the cars are doing and promote competition. Which makes no sense since a new engine configuration will most likely cost even more money to develop and those with bigger budgets will always be at the front.
The changes planned for 2008 are even more drastic. They will be going back to regular h-gates, foot-operated clutches, slicks, no traction control, standardized ECUs and brakes... basically going back to basics.

That doesn't make sence. I always thought they wanted to go faster, and higher performance in all areas. But I guess getting rid of stuff like traction control and using foot clutches, the sport might depend a lot more on the driver than the car.
Well they did this ~2-3 month internet survey and fans indicated they want to put control back in the driver's hands like the good old days.
The problem with going faster and pushing technology is that it gets more and more expensive. Right now it's full of big name manufacturers like Honda, Toyota, Mercedes, BMW, Ferrari, Renault, etc... but during the last couple of years Ferrari has been kicking everyone's ass. Considering how each team is plunking in $200-300 million every year... losing gets expensive and they might pull out to cut losses... which leaves the grid with less cars and less cars means less racing... which means less fans. The screwup they did at this years USGP did them no favors either. Too bad because Ferrari is getting an ass kicking this year for a change.