Originally posted by: ProfJohn
ahhh projections... I see... well today after 3 years the war in Iraq is up to about 300 billion, so these projections are based on another 5+ years over there?Originally posted by: Blackjack2000
Current projections are. Do you think the war will be free from here on out?It's up to $1 trillion now huh?
My projection, Osama dies tomorrow, US troops come home by Christmas, and world peace breaks out by New Years day... about as valid as your $1 trillion comment.
The 2001 Presidential daily brief that you are talking about is nearly WORD for WORD the exact same as a 1998 brief that Bill Clinton got. It seems that both Presidents were told about that idea and then told that the FBI has x number of investigations going on and decided that the FBI and CIA were on top of things and let it go at that.Originally posted by: jjzelinski
Originally posted by: ntdz
Did Clinton screw up by not getting Bin Laden? Yeah.
However, I can't really blame him, nobody could've predicted something like 9/11 happening and two wars basically resulting from it. I think had Clinton known what would've happened, he would've tried harder. Hindsight is 20/20...and Clinton had his reasons, however trifle they seem now, but in the pre-9/11 world they held more weight.
I could've sworn that Rice was given a report titled something along the lines of "AL Qaeida using planes to smash into buildings." Anyone (conjur) have a link for the lazy?
Point out facts is the "lowest level of debate"??Originally posted by: fitzov
:thumbsup:Prof John once again stoops to lowest level of debate.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Point out facts is the "lowest level of debate"??Originally posted by: fitzov
:thumbsup:Prof John once again stoops to lowest level of debate.
Obviously some people on here don't know the FACTS.
Almost every one of my posts has a link to back up what I am saying, or is in regards to an earlier post with a link.
Get over the personal attacks and try to refute me with valid arguements backed up with FACTS to support your point of view.
Glad to see that the best you can do is point out a typo, niceOriginally posted by: fitzov
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Point out facts is the "lowest level of debate"??Originally posted by: fitzov
:thumbsup:Prof John once again stoops to lowest level of debate.
Obviously some people on here don't know the FACTS.
Almost every one of my posts has a link to back up what I am saying, or is in regards to an earlier post with a link.
Get over the personal attacks and try to refute me with valid arguements backed up with FACTS to support your point of view.
It's spelled 'arguments'.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
The 2001 Presidential daily brief that you are talking about is nearly WORD for WORD the exact same as a 1998 brief that Bill Clinton got. It seems that both Presidents were told about that idea and then told that the FBI has x number of investigations going on and decided that the FBI and CIA were on top of things and let it go at that.Originally posted by: jjzelinski
Originally posted by: ntdz
Did Clinton screw up by not getting Bin Laden? Yeah.
However, I can't really blame him, nobody could've predicted something like 9/11 happening and two wars basically resulting from it. I think had Clinton known what would've happened, he would've tried harder. Hindsight is 20/20...and Clinton had his reasons, however trifle they seem now, but in the pre-9/11 world they held more weight.
I could've sworn that Rice was given a report titled something along the lines of "AL Qaeida using planes to smash into buildings." Anyone (conjur) have a link for the lazy?
August 2001 brief
December 4 1998 PDB (second link is a anti-Clinton blog, but it posts a copy of the 1998 PDF in a very easy to read manner, if I had a better source I would have posted it)
1998-"1. Reporting [-] suggests Bin Ladin and his allies are preparing for attacks in the US, including an aircraft hijacking to obtain the release of Shaykh 'Umar 'Abd al-Rahman, Ramzi Yousef, and Muhammad Sadiq 'Awda."
2001-"Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US
Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the US. Bin Ladin implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and ?bring the fighting to America.?
The truth is that EVERYONE failed prior to 9-11.
Glad to see that the best you can do is point out a typo, nice
