Originally posted by: Bateluer
You won't notice any difference between 60hx and 75hz on an LCD.
Why not? I sure do. I run 75 Hz all the time, and I will always make sure an LCD I buy supports at least 75 Hz. It feels a lot smoother to me. (OK, I'll be honest, I'd get the 20WMGX2 even if it only supported 60 Hz.

)
Some cheaper LCDs will actually blur noticeably if you force a 75hz refresh rate.
Yup, that is true, although expensive ones like the Samsung 970P also have the problem of lacking a decent look-up table for certain resolutions, and the overdrive functions suffer a bit. Besides that, the blurring will automatically be more noticeable at higher refresh rates.
"They" say higher refresh rates could damage LCDs, but I've been using 75 Hz for years without a problem. I don't believe it would damage them anymore than it would "damage" CRTs. It is certainly within spec for some. Unfortunately for the OP his LCD only goes to 60 Hz, at least with DVI, AFAIK. He may be able to push it farther with VGA, but that's in the "out of spec" territory so I can't comment on damage there. Pushing CRTs too far garbles the image completely (and probably instigates wear and tear on other components), but I'm not sure what it does to LCDs. Last time I tried doing that I think I got a couple horizontal bars across the screen. (Hey, if you never try it, you'll never know what it does.

)
You could also try flashing your monitor's EDID (flash firmware) with higher refresh rates. I did that to try to get my HDTV tuner to connect up to my monitor (though that failed). I didn't damage any components though. But it's just like overclocking. It's gonna void the warranty. In my case I was flashing the EDID just to get advertised features and a resolution/refresh rate it was supposed to support, so that's a little safer.