Please quote the part where I said anything other than 'I am ignorant of the details of this YABlackWannabeThugGetsShotByCops case.' Specifically, the part where I said 'I am ignorant of all world news, because ignoring news sources that focus on sensationalizing this dumb shit means I must ignore all news sources in existence.'
In this case, when I said "internationally significant news," I specifically meant the Ferguson case, and I called it such because it's the top story not just on American media outlets, but international media outlets like the BBC and Al Jazeera as well. I apologize if you got the wrong impression from my comment.
That said, while I have no problem with people remaining willfully ignorant about things that simply don't interest them, when you cross the line from being ignorant to being
proud of your ignorance and insulting people who don't share your desire to remain ignorant, you've entered the realm of "jackass." Why are you proud of not knowing something? I don't know how to cook because it never really appealed to me, but I don't go around saying, "Yeah, I can't cook for shit, and I'm damn proud of that!" That would be an absurd position to take. Similarly, saying "Who's this Ferguson Shooting fellow? I'm note [sic] even fucking kidding- I've heard something about blah blah someone was shot somewhere, and that's as much as I know. And I'm proud of that shit," makes you look like a needy jackass. If you don't have any interest in it, don't come into a thread about it and make a "HEY, LOOK AT ME, I DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT THIS AND THAT MAKES ME BETTER THAN YOU" post. What possible reaction could you expect from that?