Flame on:
It seems that there is a battle on ATOT between the indepedence of teenage kids and their parents..should the kid be allowed to have a car, a governor put on it, or should the parent allow their 13 year old to watch a rated R movie at school, etc
My parents were never very strict on me, at least not in a traditional sense where they wouldn't let me go out and have fun with my friends (not a wild group), see the movies I wanted to see, even drinking was allowed in their presence in HS. They were also very generous with me, and I know and appreciate that fact..I got a car, I never had to take out loans for college or grad school, stuff that wasn't paid for by scholarships they covered
However sometimes I feel like I never really broke free from them. Popular consensus on here seems to be that you protect your kid until they are 18, then all of a sudden they leap into freedom and somehow know what to do. Yes, I went to college by myself away from home, but major decisons and even some smaller ones (i.e. can I go to the beach for spring break?) I would ask my parents opinion and/or approval (which I usually got--including the spring break trip).
Right now I'm almost 23, in grad school about 1000 miles away, which I probably wouldn't have gone to had they advised/pushed me to go. I also would only marry a girl that they approve of (despite all these threads on here about guys not caring if the girls parents approve of them..I find the girls I date to care even more what their parents think about the prospective boy)...I think part of the reason I want to get back with an ex that moved away as that my mother liked her so much, and I doubt that I will find another that they like as much
Also sometmes I think that I give my parents (well especially my mother) decision-making power because I allow them to pay for stuff for me. But it seems kind of dumb not to let them..i.e. whats the point in me taking out a bunch of loans and being in debt?
Also,those of you who are now financially indepedent of your parents, was it your decision to do so, or did your parents say that they dont want to pay for you/can't afford it?
So am I becoming mature by not wanting to 'rebel', and consulting with those who are older/wiser (and then almost always taking their decision), or am I still under my parents thumb? Help the confused 'adult'..
It seems that there is a battle on ATOT between the indepedence of teenage kids and their parents..should the kid be allowed to have a car, a governor put on it, or should the parent allow their 13 year old to watch a rated R movie at school, etc
My parents were never very strict on me, at least not in a traditional sense where they wouldn't let me go out and have fun with my friends (not a wild group), see the movies I wanted to see, even drinking was allowed in their presence in HS. They were also very generous with me, and I know and appreciate that fact..I got a car, I never had to take out loans for college or grad school, stuff that wasn't paid for by scholarships they covered
However sometimes I feel like I never really broke free from them. Popular consensus on here seems to be that you protect your kid until they are 18, then all of a sudden they leap into freedom and somehow know what to do. Yes, I went to college by myself away from home, but major decisons and even some smaller ones (i.e. can I go to the beach for spring break?) I would ask my parents opinion and/or approval (which I usually got--including the spring break trip).
Right now I'm almost 23, in grad school about 1000 miles away, which I probably wouldn't have gone to had they advised/pushed me to go. I also would only marry a girl that they approve of (despite all these threads on here about guys not caring if the girls parents approve of them..I find the girls I date to care even more what their parents think about the prospective boy)...I think part of the reason I want to get back with an ex that moved away as that my mother liked her so much, and I doubt that I will find another that they like as much
Also sometmes I think that I give my parents (well especially my mother) decision-making power because I allow them to pay for stuff for me. But it seems kind of dumb not to let them..i.e. whats the point in me taking out a bunch of loans and being in debt?
Also,those of you who are now financially indepedent of your parents, was it your decision to do so, or did your parents say that they dont want to pay for you/can't afford it?
So am I becoming mature by not wanting to 'rebel', and consulting with those who are older/wiser (and then almost always taking their decision), or am I still under my parents thumb? Help the confused 'adult'..