UberNeuman
Lifer
- Nov 4, 1999
- 16,937
- 3,087
- 126
Ouch. I wouldn't be sad about it.I’m hoping more for a R. Budd Dwyer.
trump will continue to be his worst enemy until he destroys himself.
in that regard, we are all so lucky that he really is that stupid.
No lawyer here either but that sure seems like an invalid contract to me because Essential Consulting promised something it had no capacity to deliver. The deal wasn't $130k for Daniels' silence, it was $130k AND Trump's promise not to sue her, communicate with her, etc, in exchange for Daniels' silence. Since Trump wasn't even aware of those stipulations there's no way Essential Consulting could deliver on its half of the deal.
Point of clarification: it isn't the lack of Trump's signature that matters here. It's his professed ignorance of the existence of the agreement.
You are correct. You can't bind someone else to an agreement that they are unaware of, if for no other reason than any bilateral agreement creates obligations on the part of both parties and one who is unaware of his obligations cannot honor them. IMO Cohen and Trump are lying through their teeth when they claim that Trump had no knowledge of the agreement, but they're now boxed in by this lie. I don't see the NDA being enforceable.
I honestly don't understand why Trump doesn't just let her out of the NDA like AMI did in the McDougal case. The real trouble for Trump here is not her story about their affair, which she's essentially told already. It's the possibility for damaging discovery in the lawsuit. Daniels' attorney wants to depose Trump, among other things. Yet the adultery story itself is practically a nothing burger in this day and age.
Trump can't lose to someone and if he lets this case drop then I believe he would see this as a defeat and that's consistent with his behavior. But it's too late now as he and Cohen have defamed Stormy to the point that Avenetti could go after them on that issue alone.
As you say Trump could be deposed and given Trump's inconsistent statements having him under oath in front of a judge makes a heck of a lot of sense. Fox gave us an opportunity to see Trump harm himself repeatedly. Imagine if he's in front of a competent judge under oath? I'd wager he'd take the Fifth.
so he admitted that the stormy thing was real. lol. Yeah his lawyers must be going crazy.
The religious and their hang ups about sex have too much influence therefore getting them on board with ousting someone for their sex life is easier. Corruption? All you have to do is ask for forgiveness. For many the word of God comes before the law. Sex makes all of us born of sin, in sin and as sinners don'tcha know? Fu*ks so many of them up. Corruption? I believe a lot of religious people find themselves in moments beneath what they believe their character to be therefore much it's much easier to forgive (from the devine and humans) especially in desperation.This countries priorities are so f'd. Why is it always the sex, and not the corruption. Took down Clinton, and this may be the vehicle that takes down Trump.
This post took me by surprise. Laughter bubbled up and out before I even knew what was happening and it was awesome!It's like these people use microwaves to dry their hair.
I couldn't finish it.
If Trump's words become a party to a court decision can everyone involved in the interview be deposed?Apparently Trump's comments this morning were already used against him in a court of law. That was fast.
--
In a letter to the court filed in advance of the hearing, prosecutors cited Trump’s comments early Thursday on the cable show “Fox and Friends” in which he said Cohen has performed only a “tiny, tiny little fraction” of the president’s legal work.
Prosecutors argued that Trump’s remarks proved that relatively few of the seized documents were likely to be privileged communications between the two men.
The prosecutors’ speedy incorporation of Trump’s Fox interview into legal documents provided a vivid illustration of the strategic downsides of the president’s media interviews and off-the-cuff remarks and tweets — and why lawyers urge their clients to limit public commentary about ongoing legal matters.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...90efaf1f1ee_story.html?utm_term=.9fff2b1f8607
At the very least the booth was probably losing their collective shit and tried to limit the damageIf Trump's words become a party to a court decision can everyone involved in the interview be deposed?
Meaning, anyone @Fox involved in the decision to shutdown the interview. Clearly the stage stooges were under orders to stop Trump from continuing to incriminate himself. Think that order came from the head of Fox?
If Trump's words become a party to a court decision can everyone involved in the interview be deposed?
Meaning, anyone @Fox involved in the decision to shutdown the interview. Clearly the stage stooges were under orders to stop Trump from continuing to incriminate himself. Think that order came from the head of Fox?
This post took me by surprise. Laughter bubbled up and out before I even knew what was happening and it was awesome!
