- Jul 10, 2005
- 1,053
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Lithan
I doubt these will be efficiently dual core. Probably make one core do 90% of the work and the other core do 10%. But I could be wrong. Now tell me COD2 or Diablo3 (Comon Blizzard you'd make more money than Microsoft if you just gave gamers the games they want instead of worthless 99% Single player expansion packs to games that people only play multiplayer anyway (WC3)) will be dual core optimized and show me some results that prove it actually works and makes a noticable difference, and I'll buy a 3800+ x2 TODAY.
Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Good, hopefully it won't have the annoying and embarrassing skipping issues.
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Looks to me like Intel is trying to put a wedge in the gaming market...dual core vs regular single core...
Originally posted by: jkostans
Pfff this means nothing. Show me some numbers. I am seriously doubting anything will come of these "optimizations". A real multi-threaded game is going to take much longer to develop, and I know the guys at monolith didn't start with multi-threading in mind. Oh and theres no skipping issue unless you try to set the graphics too high without the required hardware. 256mb video card and 2gb of ram is needed for maximum texture resolution.... pretty much the same with BF2, but for some reason no one complains about that.
Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Good, hopefully it won't have the annoying and embarrassing skipping issues.