Wow. Think it's safe to directly compare? I mean, would differences in projects and points per project have an effect?
What I have going on right now:
GPU0: Running 8010 Project, 2510 Points, 15,490 PPD
GPU1: Running 8010 Project, 2510 Points, 15,490 PPD
Anyone out there running the same projects/points?
How long have the 680s been running on F@H? I'm not sure if 15K/card is the maximum PPD or not, but it could be the card(s) need to run on F@H for a bit before you would see 40K/card or higher.
How long have the 680s been running on F@H? I'm not sure if 15K/card is the maximum PPD or not, but it could be the card(s) need to run on F@H for a bit before you would see 40K/card or higher.
Hmm. Well, GPU0 has been running about 3 hours and GPU1 has been running about 2.5 hours (took some time to get more than 1 GPU folding at the same time. My dumb error)
And both cards are hovering at about 15.5K +/- 100.
EDIT: Wait a sec. Both cards just climbed to about 16.25K PPD. So I guess I'll let it run a while.
The PPD changes with WUs. Therefore it is good to run the GPUs for a number of days to see how the GPUs perform.
OTOH: the 6-series of NVIDIA's card have a worse double precision performance than the 4- and 5-series have. But I don't remember if that matters. In BOINC-projects, such as MilkyWay@Home and some others, i matters greatly.
Yes SLI is disabled when folding. Ok, I'll run it for a few days to see what gives.
@petrusbroder: I don't "think" double precision is a factor in F@H.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.