- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,570
- 10,202
- 126
I pulled out this (new custom build), made with (older technology products), to see if it would be "better" for a client than their current SFF slim Gateway / Acer whatever Sandy Bridge Pentium, with a new-ish 1TB WD Blue HDD (that I replaced for them a few months ago).
This one has 4GB of RAM (2x2GB dual-channel), and a 120GB SSD. I suspect that the SB Pentium has the CPU advantage, but this has the iGPU advantage, and is still supported for Win10.
Plus, this one has legit Win10 on it, and client wanted to move from Win7 64-bit to Win10.
The issue is, they have basically NO money, so no budget for any sort of "real" upgrade. I built these FM1 boxes on the super-crazy cheap. (Would be close to $130 if I swapped the SSD out for a 160GB zero-POH WD Blue drive.)
Edit: I just ran the CPU-Z 1.81 benchmark, UGH, these APUs are pretty horrid in the CPU performance dept. MT of 256, ST of 133.
By comparison, an E8500 (3.16Ghz) Core2, is MT 530, and ST 272. Basically twice the performance.
So this APU is equivalent to a Core2, running at 1.508Ghz. Errm, yeeeah... I don't know if I want to recommend this as an upgrade. But... SSD!? Win10?!? Hmm. Tough call, whether this is much of an improvement.
By comparison, my Ryzen 3 1200 quad-core, OCed to 3.8Ghz, scores, I think, 1700 for MT, and 479 for ST. That's a HUGE difference in processing power. For what, twice the price total?
This one has 4GB of RAM (2x2GB dual-channel), and a 120GB SSD. I suspect that the SB Pentium has the CPU advantage, but this has the iGPU advantage, and is still supported for Win10.
Plus, this one has legit Win10 on it, and client wanted to move from Win7 64-bit to Win10.
The issue is, they have basically NO money, so no budget for any sort of "real" upgrade. I built these FM1 boxes on the super-crazy cheap. (Would be close to $130 if I swapped the SSD out for a 160GB zero-POH WD Blue drive.)
Edit: I just ran the CPU-Z 1.81 benchmark, UGH, these APUs are pretty horrid in the CPU performance dept. MT of 256, ST of 133.
By comparison, an E8500 (3.16Ghz) Core2, is MT 530, and ST 272. Basically twice the performance.
So this APU is equivalent to a Core2, running at 1.508Ghz. Errm, yeeeah... I don't know if I want to recommend this as an upgrade. But... SSD!? Win10?!? Hmm. Tough call, whether this is much of an improvement.
By comparison, my Ryzen 3 1200 quad-core, OCed to 3.8Ghz, scores, I think, 1700 for MT, and 479 for ST. That's a HUGE difference in processing power. For what, twice the price total?
Last edited: