- Oct 13, 2004
- 24,778
- 4
- 0
It seems like a good argument, cos obviously the fly has to slow down, then come to a halt before it can accelerate in the other direction...thus stopping the train for an instant 
but that would assume that both the fly and the train couldn't flex/crumple to absorb the hit
in which case the train wouldn't stop, or would it?
Help, i'm very confused
but that would assume that both the fly and the train couldn't flex/crumple to absorb the hit
in which case the train wouldn't stop, or would it?
Help, i'm very confused
