I just thought I'd compare and contrast with this story here.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/...k-handyman-now-please-leave-our-neighborhood/
/Tazing not found.
that's a completely different situation, that guy was just detained. Just because an attorney says "I'm an attorney" I would tell her to fuck off and that I would release him when I'm ready.
If I saw a guy that matched the description of a burglar, I'd detain him for an investigation. If someone came in and tried to remove him in the middle of my investigation, I would tell her she is mistaken and can't do shit about it...and if she really wants to press it, I would charge her with interfering.
Detaining people is not a big deal, it's barely an inconvenience...and NO you are not free to go and also, you are NOT under arrest...lol
I think that situation though...it just on face value appears to be a stop & talk and they didn't want to detain him. If they did and they let her take him away that's F'ed up. Maybe she didn't realize how disabled he was....
Oh..."one of the officers ordered the 64-year-old man to sit on the curb while she put on disposable gloves and prepared to search him." that could have been bad if she had no reason to believe he was involved and he didn't consent to it. and Nope no suspect info " The officers had no description of a possible suspect"
Last edited:
