- Dec 27, 2001
- 47,351
- 14
- 61
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...ment-used-black-mug-shots-for-target-practice
Its just a couple of bad apples. ...
Its just a couple of bad apples. ...
But he denied racial profiling was at play, noting that the sniper team included minority officers. He said his department also uses pictures of whites and Hispanics for target practice.
Should they have been more politically correct in making sure every set of targets appropriately reflected the criminal population, or is the problem that they used mugshots as targets at all?
What's the outrage?
Part of me wants to be outraged, but in reality, training should be as realistic as possible, and one of the hardest parts of getting used to sniping is seeing a human face in the scope (from what I've read), so I don't think a silhouette target would necessarily be as effective in training.I think the outrage involves the inherent racism involved in using black mug shots as target practice, rather than say, standard pictures and targets that are ordered in bulk.
But, I forgot. Racism doesn't exist. And even if it did, it's okay for the police to be racist.
Part of me wants to be outraged, but in reality, training should be as realistic as possible, and one of the hardest parts of getting used to sniping is seeing a human face in the scope (from what I've read), so I don't think a silhouette target would necessarily be as effective in training.
Its just a couple of bad apples. ...
Well when the prisons are 90% black, then those mug shots are just a random sample. No bias found.
Laughably stupid analysis.
Thanks for the chuckle!
Solution:
Only print out mugshots of "those" people.
Racism doesn't exist at all. In any way!
Should they have been more politically correct in making sure every set of targets appropriately reflected the criminal population, or is the problem that they used mugshots as targets at all?
What's the outrage?
Part of me wants to be outraged, but in reality, training should be as realistic as possible, and one of the hardest parts of getting used to sniping is seeing a human face in the scope (from what I've read), so I don't think a silhouette target would necessarily be as effective in training.
What would happen if cops saw people using pictures of cops for target practice?
I am guessing those would be construed as threats on law enforcement and resulted in arrests.
Did you read the damn article? The mugshots they used were not just of black convicts. Whites, hispanics etc were also used. Some of the officers using the mugshots were black as well. Were they being racist towards blacks also?
Still trying to determine exactly what exactly the outrage is: using mugshots at all, or that many - though not all - of the mugshots used were of black convicts?
reduce, reuse, recycle. I hear paper targets for practice aren't cheap, so use what you got.
How about do not commit crimes => no prison => no mugshot picture to be used as target?
Shocking simple solution.
Um, right now a little extra hesitation would be a GOOD THING. At the very least, they should be using targets with guns drawn, not mug shots which by definition are of unarmed people. They should be hesitating before shooting an unarmed person.Those must be the same people butt hurt when they used kids faces for target practice. The whole idea is to not hesitate due to psychological factors when you make the right decision.
Assuming that's true it largely takes out the sting, but using a mug shot from 15 years ago argues against that being true.Did you read the damn article? The mugshots they used were not just of black convicts. Whites, hispanics etc were also used. Some of the officers using the mugshots were black as well. Were they being racist towards blacks also?
Still trying to determine exactly what exactly the outrage is: using mugshots at all, or that many - though not all - of the mugshots used were of black convicts?
lolWe'll you gotta know your target audience....
