• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Florida housing sex offenders under a bridge

Lord Evermore

Diamond Member
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/04/05/bridge.sex.offenders/index.html

Go ahead and get the "f--- them damn perverts they should die" out of your system, then explain this to me.

In the case of anyone who has limits on where they can live, which for sex offenders can be extreme, how can the state say "if you can't find housing, you have to come live here" regardless of where that place is? And even given that, how can they tell people they have to live under a bridge, in the open, in squalor? Isn't that punishment AFTER they've been freed from prison? And "unusual" as well? I thought the law was to tell them where they could NOT live, I didn't know the state could tell you where you WILL live (unless you're in prison or otherwise incarcerated). What would stop the state from just doing that to any homeless person?

Regardless of their criminal record of course, I'd tell them and any non-ex-con "if you can't find anyplace to live, go somewhere else". Why do they make it sound like these guys have no choice but to live in Miami? Unless there's a specific part of their release terms that says they have to remain in a certain area, they should be able to go anywhere they want as long as the prison system is kept apprised. It's not like they'd be leaving a lot behind, and I doubt they've gotten great jobs they wouldn't want to leave or couldn't do the same thing elsewhere..
 
Originally posted by: Lord Evermore
Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
That's unheard of.

And of course, searching for any words one could reasonably consider related to that story wouldn't have found that post. Don't blame me for a ****** search function and people who post poorly.

ehem

personaly I could care less if someone reposts one of my threads
 
Of course, I also asked a legitimate question, rather than just making a witty remark. I really don't know what makes me keep thinking things like this will work out right.
 
they are still on parole/probation, they have not yet completed their sentences, they are still under the control of the state
 
There is a limit to what control the state has. Can the state order them to live in a sewer just because they're on probation?
 
Back
Top