On behalf of several members of the community, I would like to express my shock and disappointment at some of S0Y73NTGR33N's threats. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. He plans to take rights away from individuals whom only S0Y73NTGR33N perceives as phlegmatic. He has instructed his adulators not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, S0Y73NTGR33N knows he has something to hide. He somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to his demands. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization.
Contrary to what S0Y73NTGR33N would have you believe, I feel that he has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. S0Y73NTGR33N obviously has none, or he wouldn't accelerate the natural tendency of civilization to devolve from order to chaos, liberty to tyranny, and virtue to vice. Someone has to be willing to deal stiffly with fatuous meanies who convince domineering gormless-types that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that his jokes are our final line of defense against tyrrany.
Although theoretical differences can be drawn between S0Y73NTGR33N's untrustworthy campaigns and patronizing sesquipedalianism, these are distinctions without a difference. Prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially S0Y73NTGR33N's clueless form of it -- is. I pray for the day when those who popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge self-absorbed, censorious Luddites to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up will see what they're doing to the world and to all of its citizens. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. S0Y73NTGR33N's whinges have an unsavory historical track record. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because S0Y73NTGR33N complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today.
Not surprisingly, I'm not very conversant with his background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that S0Y73NTGR33N's idiotic claim that those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve is just that, an idiotic claim. At no time in the past did the worst sorts of yawping mattoids there are shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. My message is clear: S0Y73NTGR33N is typical of annoying, malign tin-pot tyrants in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his wheelings and dealings. His constant whining and yammering is a background noise that never seems to go away, which is another way of saying that his put-downs have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life!
S0Y73NTGR33N's hirelings are violent invidious-types (literally!). Not that I've come to expect any better from S0Y73NTGR33N. This may be a foregone conclusion, but each rung on the ladder of voyeurism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for him to promulgate partisan prejudice against others. That is the standard process by which rotten, brown-nosing mountebanks have a serious destabilizing effect on our institutions.
As a practical matter, if I have a bias, it is only against scurrilous freaks of nature who declare martial law, suspend elections, and round up dissidents (i.e., anyone who does not buy his lie that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted). Socrates was condemned to death by the city of Athens for his views. I hope I don't receive the same treatment for saying that by refusing to act, by refusing to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us, we are giving S0Y73NTGR33N the power to make bribery legal and part of business as usual. I aver I am not alone when I say that I don't believe that credentialism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. So when S0Y73NTGR33N says that that's what I believe, I see how little he understands my position.
While it is reasonable to expect that his relationship to the real world is peripheral, it remains that if he can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If he can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. Anyone who takes even a cursory glance at this letter will quickly discover that S0Y73NTGR33N refers to a variety of things using the word "pancreaticoduodenostomy". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of batty stereotypes. At any rate, he wants to concentrate all the wealth of the world into his own hands. Who does he think he is? I mean, he says that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life.
I'm sorry if I've gotten a little off track here, but S0Y73NTGR33N will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let him display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations. At least putting up with another S0Y73NTGR33N hissy fit is easier than convincing S0Y73NTGR33N's votaries that the first lies that S0Y73NTGR33N told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; his lies will grow until they blot out the sun. Believe me, I certainly don't want to give him a chance to direct social activity toward philanthropic flim-flam rather than toward the elimination of the basic deficiencies in the organization of our economic and cultural life. Some of the things S0Y73NTGR33N says and some of the things he stands for are so homicidal, it hurts to think about them. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if S0Y73NTGR33N finds a way to flout all of society's rules.
I have taken the liberty of letting him know that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by his money-grubbing accusations. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment. We can't stop S0Y73NTGR33N overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most uneducated manifestations. If truth, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder, then the last time I told his cronies that I want to analyze his smear tactics in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion, they declared in response, "But S0Y73NTGR33N has been robbed of all he does not possess." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. My current plan is to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them. Yes, S0Y73NTGR33N will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but my opinions are the obverse of his. That said, let me continue. Admittedly, he conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. But that's because he intends to create a new social class. Inhumane hell-raisers, confused beggars, and unambitious wisenheimers will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their coadjutors.
What S0Y73NTGR33N considers a fair shake, the rest of us consider a repressive, humiliating, culture-stripping experience. With enough time and room, it would be easy to show why this must be true, but the clinching argument is simply that S0Y73NTGR33N is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead. If, five years ago, I had described a person like S0Y73NTGR33N to you and told you that in five years, he'd twist the teaching of history to suit his gloomy purposes, you'd have thought me pesky. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how the next time he decides to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture, he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits? I mean, his cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: We may never learn the answers to some of the more vexing questions surrounding S0Y73NTGR33N's motives.
Facebook
Twitter