Fish poacher get 21 days in jail and serious fine

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,268
12,784
136
21 days in jail for fish poacher
Penalty unusually severe, officials say
'Like he killed a person, not a fish'


SCOTT ROBERTS
STAFF REPORTER

A 21-day jail sentence levied against an Aurora man for poaching fish was unusually stiff, conservation officials say.

In addition to the jail time, Sergei Homiakov was slapped with an $8,500 fine and had his fishing licence suspended for five years after pleading guilty last month to over-fishing, fishing during a closed time and unlawfully transporting fish.

Homiakov, 30, was released Friday after serving 12 days in Lindsay's Central East Correctional Centre.

The sentence was handed down by Justice of the Peace Robert Boychyn and relates to a Feb. 14 incident, when Durham police found Homiakov with bags containing 23 rainbow trout at Wilmot Creek in Clarington at about 1:30 a.m. Ministry conservation officers were called and seized the catch, which contained 15 female and eight male trout.

"Jail time is certainly rare in these cases," said Bill Lafferty, natural resources ministry enforcement supervisor for the Aurora district. "I've seen fines that high but ... I have not seen the additional jail time."

Boychyn's decision was well within his legal means, ministry officials said. Under the Federal Fisheries Act, jail time of up to one year and fines topping $100,000 can be issued.

But Crown prosecutor Veronica McGuire was not seeking the maximum penalty. In fact, she was not asking that Homiakov be jailed at all. She only sought an $8,500 fine and the forfeiture of equipment involved in the capture and the fish.

"The judge basically ordered the fine and further sentenced Mr. Homiakov to 21 days in jail," said Brendan Crawley, an attorney-general's office spokesman.

Homiakov, who immigrated to Canada from Belarus five years ago, could not comment because he does not speak English. But his wife, Irina Homiakov, lashed out at the justice system for jailing her husband.

"They acted like he killed a person, not a fish," she said, insisting her husband did not know the provincial regulations. "I was shocked. I wasn't expecting them to put him in jail. I don't know how they can do that."

Homiakov, who has no previous convictions, represented himself in court and pleaded guilty because he could not afford a lawyer, his wife said.

"I understand now that he was wrong to fish then. But to leave a wife without a husband and a child without a father is wrong, too," said Irina Homiakov.

Mitch Phinney, the conservation officer who handled the case, could not recall the last time he has seen jail time allotted for such an offence. "The sentence was hefty. It's rare."

The conviction was likely tougher because it was spawning season for rainbow trout, said Phinney. The 15 female trout captured would have represented about 80,000 lost eggs, which would have directly reduced the population.

Boychyn could not be reached for comment.

Although poaching incidents have decreased since the late 1980s, Lafferty said the sentence would "send a strong message" to anyone thinking of illegally catching fish.


:Q

What is not stated is that Wilmot Creek is protected spawning ground, and a major fish hatchery in Ontario.

discuss.



 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,268
12,784
136
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
discuss.

Shoulda made up a status card, then he could not only keep the fish but get a national apology, a few acres of land, and a taxgrab to boot.

- M4H
LOL

He could have tried another Ipperwash. ;)


 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Wow, and usually Canadian people blast the US for its harsh laws. But punch a moose or fish too much in Canada, and you're going to jail!
 

mercanucaribe

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
9,763
1
0
He should have known better than to catch 15 rainbow trout! According to the article, that could greatly reduce the population.
 

HN

Diamond Member
Jan 19, 2001
8,186
4
0
"They acted like he killed a person, not a fish," she said, insisting her husband did not know the provincial regulations. "I was shocked. I wasn't expecting them to put him in jail. I don't know how they can do that."

1. ignorance is no excuse
2. i'd hate to live where they lived if someone only gets 21 days for killing a person
 

bernse

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2000
3,229
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
discuss.

Shoulda made up a status card, then he could not only keep the fish but get a national apology, a few acres of land, and a taxgrab to boot.

- M4H

+1
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
Originally posted by: HN
"They acted like he killed a person, not a fish," she said, insisting her husband did not know the provincial regulations. "I was shocked. I wasn't expecting them to put him in jail. I don't know how they can do that."

1. ignorance is no excuse
2. i'd hate to live where they lived if someone only gets 21 days for killing a person

yeah but either is cruel or unusual punishment....

didnt martha stewart get like 60 days??
 

oogabooga

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2003
7,806
3
81
wow that's pretty harsh : i guess he should have known better.

<--- scared to go fishing now.
 

CptObvious

Platinum Member
Mar 5, 2004
2,501
7
81
Seems harsh to me. Considering he was facing jail time, couldn't speak English, and couldn't afford a lawyer, I think he should have been appointed a lawyer. In the U.S. it would have violated his due process rights if he wasn't given the option (not sure about Canadian law).

Hope his cellmates weren't looking for 'fresh fish'. (groan)
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,268
12,784
136
Originally posted by: CptObvious
Seems harsh to me. Considering he was facing jail time, couldn't speak English, and couldn't afford a lawyer, I think he should have been appointed a lawyer. In the U.S. it would have violated his due process rights if he wasn't given the option (not sure about Canadian law).

Hope his cellmates weren't looking for 'fresh fish'. (groan)
You are given the choice to have a lawyer or not. It is your right under Canadian law to have a lawyer. He choose to plead guilty and represent himself.

Besides, he broke the law and 21 days is not life.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Good! I don't consider this harsh at all. Overfishing has done horrible things to the fishing industry.
 

tami

Lifer
Nov 14, 2004
11,588
3
81
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: CptObvious
Seems harsh to me. Considering he was facing jail time, couldn't speak English, and couldn't afford a lawyer, I think he should have been appointed a lawyer. In the U.S. it would have violated his due process rights if he wasn't given the option (not sure about Canadian law).

Hope his cellmates weren't looking for 'fresh fish'. (groan)
You are given the choice to have a lawyer or not. It is your right under Canadian law to have a lawyer. He choose to plead guilty and represent himself.

Besides, he broke the law and 21 days is not life.

however, he couldn't afford the lawyer, even though he had the right to choose one. i wonder what kind of financial toll the $8,500 would put on him.

21 days is time. time is money. he's screwed many many ways, and so are his loved ones.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
What the fsck?

No, just.. no.

He got twenty one days in jail. Who is the completly braindead fscktart that said "Like he killed a person, not a fish"?

Good. Poaching is poaching. It is against the law, and the penalty should be more stiff than just a slap on the wrist a'la a traffic violation.
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,268
12,784
136
It wouldn't have been so bad if he didn't do it during spawning season.

But if you pay the piper, you must dance to his tune.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,333
1,841
126
Perhaps if he woulda learned english (or french as that's in Canada), then he could have defended himself in court a bit better.
 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
I dont care if its protected or not, he is a prick for knowingly over fishing..I mean really ....if you arent going to eat it..put it back....
And you dont need 20 fish!