• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

First-time OC results -- any thoughts?

So I've been reading about OC'ing my AMD64 system for the past couple of months (including the 'guide to OC' forum post) and I finally assimilated enough info to try it for myself. I feel like I've had some success in adding another 400Mhz, however, there are still a few pieces I don't get and maybe someone can fill me in.

Stock system:
AMD 3700+ san diego
ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe
mushkin 2-2-2-5 pc3200 512MBx2
xfx geforce 7800gt

So I first tried loosening all my RAM timings to 3-4-4-8 and maxed the voltage to both the RAM and the CPU (2.9 and 1.55 respectively). I dropped the CPU multi to x10 and raised the memory bus to 240Mhz and dropped my HTT to 4x hoping for a modest 200Mhz gain. No dice on prime95, and so went through various settings trying to get it to stabilize (eventually dropping below stock 2.2ghz). I ended up with CPU multi of 8x and HTT 3x and still no luck. So I tried to go in the other direction and left the CPU multi at 11x, HTT at 3x and set the memory bus to 240Mhz. Still failing prime95 but very close. I ended up with multiplier 11x, HTT=auto (no setting I tried seemed to make ANY difference) and memory bus at 237Mhz. This gave me 2.6Ghz, 948FSB and no problems after 10 minutes of prime95. I was able to lower the CPU voltage to 1.475v (lowered my CPU temp 8 degrees C) and tighten my memory timings up to 2-4-3-7. I'll run prime95 again when I go off to work to fully verify stability - it passes the five minute test so far.

So 2.6Ghz is pretty satisfying, but I don't understand why I'm not able to have a stable system with any multiplier other than x11??? Could it be that my $150 mushkin RAM is just a poor overclocker and doesn't do well with higher bus speeds? (I realize now I should've gotten OCZ platinum or something but I didn't know that at the time of purchase.)

I also don't get why my FSB is 800Mhz at stock speeds -- I read that your FSB is your HTT x Mem speed, and that it should always be less than 1000 on current systems. That doesn't appear to be the case given that no setting I put on my HTT makes any difference in my FSB rating. If it in fact IS what I thought, then it appears to be locked in at x4 regardless of my settings because my FSB rating (according to my asus utility) is ALWAYS 4x whatever I set my memory speed (4x237=948 in this case). Maybe this is totally obvious, but I haven't been able to figure it out.

My last question has to do with the BIOS setting "Memclock Index Value" which defaults to 400, which I assume correlates to DDR400. There are other settings in there like 333, 433, and so on, but I don't get how this factors into the grand scheme of OC'ing. I thought that your DDR rating was a derivative of other parts of the OC process rather than being an independent setting?

So the end result is my 3dmark05 score went from 7155 to 7249. I was kinda hoping for a larger jump, but I'll take what I can get.

So if anyone has any advice as to how I can squeeze more out of this setup, or even as to how my approach is fundamentally wrong in some way then I'll be very grateful. In fact I'll take anything I can get.

TIA

 
1. did you lock your PCI/PCIe bus?
2. your ram problably can't OC very much so I'd keep the timings where they are and use a multiplier on it. i.e. FSB at 240 and 5/6 ram multi puts your ram back at stock speeds. 240 * 5/6 = 200. Your ram multi appears (just read) as 333 instead of 5/6, same thing 333/400, well pretty close.
 
"Memclock Index Value" as used in the Bios...if your memory is PC3200 (DDR400) setting it at 400 gives you a 1:1 divider for memory speed. In other words, your memory speed will increase along with your CPU FSB. Setting it to 333 will set your memory divider at 5:4 to allow for higher overclocking while keeping the memory slower so you don't hit its limit.

Someone else will be able to help more with the HTT issues.

-z

edit for semantics
 
OK I'll try out the mem divider.

So 5/6 = .833
333/400 = .832

.833 x 240 = 200Mhz. Hmm...it's all starting to become clear...

So if I set my Memclock Index to 333 and my Memory bus to 313Mhz and multiplier of x10 I'd end up with the 2.6Ghz I have with my current settings. Very interesting...
 
Originally posted by: letstalkcisco
OK I'll try out the mem divider.

So 5/6 = .833
333/400 = .832

.833 x 240 = 200Mhz. Hmm...it's all starting to become clear...

So if I set my Memclock Index to 333 and my Memory bus to 313Mhz and multiplier of x10 I'd end up with the 2.6Ghz I have with my current settings. Very interesting...

Yes, but your memory will be slower (but more stable). Only use a divider if you're getting up past 110% on the FSB (higher if using ram that overclocks really well).

Also, I don't think you're going to need 2.9v on the memory. Try with stock first (I'm assuming 2.6) or 2.7, then when you get all you can out of it start upping the voltage.

-z
 
One other thing to check is your SATA drives. Use the SATA 3 & 4 ports if possible. For some reason having devices attached to the first two SATA ports limits OC capability on that mobo.
 
Back
Top