The first, but was the nonsensical A/B crap really necessary?
The first, but was the nonsensical A/B crap really necessary?
If A > B and you have the option to control whether A or B is consumed first which is the superior choice?
A -> B (Start strong)
B -> A (End strong)
Is the first or last impression more important?
if using logic, then simplify and you get A=A, B=B
1st impressions are more important. it'll take several followups for u to change your mind
ie: if u thought the guy was a dick the 1st time u met him, then 2nd time u meet him your already are predisposed to not liking him.
it'll take alot more effort to overcome the 1st impression
You've created an assumption within the problem that the first impression will lead to the last, and that the first impression is NOT the last.
Thus, the obvious answer is that the last impression is always more important, because people's overall impression continuously evolves, while a bad or neutral start is always compensatable, the last impression leaves the possibly of future interactions either open or shut.
no, actually... because without a first you may never get a chance for the last.Both of them are equally important....
/thread
You're right, my abstraction is still not accurate.
A or B first, redux:
When controlling access to a set of content, where the set includes two related notions or objects, and the lesser of the two is of neutral quality while the other is superior, which should be presented first to elicit a better impression of the set as a whole?
