story link
Students Protest Blood Drive Screening
ASSOCIATED PRESS
MONMOUTH, Ore. (AP) - Two student legislators at Western Oregon University have launched a drive to ban Red Cross blood drives on campus, claiming the donor screening process discriminates against gays.
The two students are particularly upset about a donor question that reads: "Are you a male who has had sex with another male since 1977, even once?"
The federal Food and Drug Administration, which regulates the Red Cross screening process, will not accept a donation from someone who answers 'yes' to the question, in order to help eliminate potentially HIV-tainted blood.
"By continuing to allow the Red Cross on our campus, the university is telling all the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students that we don't care about you," said student senator Shauna Bates, who is co-sponsoring the legislation.
If the resolution passes with a two-thirds majority vote of the senate's 14 members, no student-funded organization would be allowed to sponsor a blood drive. Current blood drives on campus, though, get their funding from the university's health services department.
A meeting on the topic Monday drew students and various health officials from the university and Red Cross opposing the move.
Student Molly Underwood said that matters of public health supersede those of discrimination.
"Just because somebody thinks something is unfair doesn't mean you should ban it," Underwood said. "Lives could be at stake."
Students Protest Blood Drive Screening
ASSOCIATED PRESS
MONMOUTH, Ore. (AP) - Two student legislators at Western Oregon University have launched a drive to ban Red Cross blood drives on campus, claiming the donor screening process discriminates against gays.
The two students are particularly upset about a donor question that reads: "Are you a male who has had sex with another male since 1977, even once?"
The federal Food and Drug Administration, which regulates the Red Cross screening process, will not accept a donation from someone who answers 'yes' to the question, in order to help eliminate potentially HIV-tainted blood.
"By continuing to allow the Red Cross on our campus, the university is telling all the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students that we don't care about you," said student senator Shauna Bates, who is co-sponsoring the legislation.
If the resolution passes with a two-thirds majority vote of the senate's 14 members, no student-funded organization would be allowed to sponsor a blood drive. Current blood drives on campus, though, get their funding from the university's health services department.
A meeting on the topic Monday drew students and various health officials from the university and Red Cross opposing the move.
Student Molly Underwood said that matters of public health supersede those of discrimination.
"Just because somebody thinks something is unfair doesn't mean you should ban it," Underwood said. "Lives could be at stake."
Facebook
Twitter