First it was smoking, now city considers banning cuss words in bars

aplefka

Lifer
Feb 29, 2004
12,014
2
0
No way will that ever stand a chance. That's a political suicide right there if any politicians really try to go forward with that.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
As for your 'next up' - I remember reading a town in Texas where cops actually went INTO the bar and arrested people for public intoxication. Not people causing problems, just drunk people.
 

pyonir

Lifer
Dec 18, 2001
40,855
319
126
Back in the old days, many cities/towns had ordinances that wouldn't allow furniture in drinking establishments, because they figured if people couldn't sit and be comfortable, no one would want to go to the saloons. That worked out real well for them.
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: Queasy
Will they ban looking at someone funny next?

They already have. It's called "sexual harassment". Pretty much any woman who wants can go to HR and claim that you were "undressing her with your eyes", whatever that means.

I wonder how they would plan on enforcing such a stupid ban. Would they serious station cops inside the bars to arrest anyone who swore?
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
John Spartan you are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.", "John Spartan You are fined one half credit for a sotto voce violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.", "Your repeated violation of the Verbal Morality Statute has caused me to notify the San Angeles Police Department, please remain where you are for your reprimand."
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: Anubis
John Spartan you are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.", "John Spartan You are fined one half credit for a sotto voce violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.", "Your repeated violation of the Verbal Morality Statute has caused me to notify the San Angeles Police Department, please remain where you are for your reprimand."

Be well, Anubis!
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
They would ultimately have to prove a health risk to get support from most people here.

However, since the issue is that things get a little to rowdy in the district, the better approach than just "banning" things would be to encourage bar owners to post a simple warning at the door that clearly states what manner of things may happen there and crack down on things that may be happening in the streets with better police patrols. It sounds stupid, but it's a better approach if they truly are concerned about the "historical district" factor and not just looking for easy revenue and justification for extra police forces.

I get the impression that this town has a very outspoken religious or older population.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Injury
They would ultimately have to prove a health risk to get support from most people here.

However, since the issue is that things get a little to rowdy in the district, the better approach than just "banning" things would be to encourage bar owners to post a simple warning at the door that clearly states what manner of things may happen there and crack down on things that may be happening in the streets with better police patrols. It sounds stupid, but it's a better approach if they truly are concerned about the "historical district" factor and not just looking for easy revenue and justification for extra police forces.

I get the impression that this town has a very outspoken religious or older population.

Secondhand profanity kills! The govt told me so!