First Drive: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6

[NFS4]

First Drive: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6

 

[Chaotic42]

Originally posted by: NFS4
First Drive: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6

I'd like to rent a suit and go test drive one.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: Chaotic42

Originally posted by: NFS4
First Drive: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6

I'd like to rent a suit and go test drive one.

All you need is this suit and you'll fit right in...especially if the car is black.

 

[RagingBITCH]

"That thing got a Hemi? No? I don't fvcking want it!"

 

[whiteboy81]

Sounds like a pretty sweet car. However...in price it is extremely close to a Z06 Vette which would be a much better value.

 

[andylawcc]

wtf? AMG Dodge?

 

[acemcmac]

you guys have to rent suits? heck im in college and I have a selection

 

[andylawcc]

Originally posted by: acemcmac
you guys have to rent suits? heck im in college and I have a selection

not many ppl here are as "fashion conscious" as you are

 

[Strk]

Well, it is nice that they beefed it up, but it still really isn't my cup of tea. It would be fun to test drive/rent for a day and screw around in, but like someone else already said, for 45k you can get plenty of other cars that would be more fun to own.

 

[sillymofo]

Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

 

[virtueixi]

I agree. For the price, it's not worth it.

 

[Strk]

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

Why not just get a 300C which is about $18,000 less than either of 'em

 

[Strk]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

Why not just get a 300C which is about $18,000 less than either of 'em

Because I think the 300C is ugly as sin

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

Why not just get a 300C which is about $18,000 less than either of 'em

Because I think the 300C is ugly as sin

Bah, it looks better than the CTS-V and is almost as powerful. Much better looking inteior too

http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/01.jpg
http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/03.jpg

 

[Strk]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

Why not just get a 300C which is about $18,000 less than either of 'em

Because I think the 300C is ugly as sin

Bah, it looks better than the CTS-V and is almost as powerful. Much better looking inteior too

http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/01.jpg
http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/03.jpg

Eh.... To each his own, but I :heart: the Caddy

 

[RagingBITCH]

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

Why not just get a 300C which is about $18,000 less than either of 'em

Because I think the 300C is ugly as sin

Bah, it looks better than the CTS-V and is almost as powerful. Much better looking inteior too

http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/01.jpg
http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/03.jpg

Eh.... To each his own, but I :heart: the Caddy

300C >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CTS-V

I like the Magnum over the 300 though

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: RagingBITCH

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: Strk

Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Have you seen the car upclose and in person? The interior is plasticky (?) and it looks cheap. When sitting inside it, not very comfortabl, and if you're a small person, like me (~5'7"), you'll find the seats are not accommodating at all. Too much empty spaces, and the rear seats are small.

I have yet to see one in person, but I'm not really dying to see one in person either

Now I guess I have good reason not to want to see one in person :roll:

Personally, I'd rather spend 5k more and get a Cadillac CTS-V. It is fast and it seats 4, so you could even use it as a daily driver, although a z06 gets better mileage.(but the Caddy weighs something like 800lbs more, so no surprise)

Why not just get a 300C which is about $18,000 less than either of 'em

Because I think the 300C is ugly as sin

Bah, it looks better than the CTS-V and is almost as powerful. Much better looking inteior too

http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/01.jpg
http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2003/n09/news/800/03.jpg

Eh.... To each his own, but I :heart: the Caddy

300C >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CTS-V

I like the Magnum over the 300 though

TOTALLY BADASS!

 

[SuperTool]

That thing got a Hemi?

 

[toant103]

Originally posted by: virtueixi
I agree. For the price, it's not worth it.

 

[isekii]

spending 40k+ on a Chrysler is blasphemy

 

[SuperTool]

There is nothing Chrysler about this car except the badge. It's an AMG Mercedes made in Germany.
I frankly don't see much point to it. It's too boring to be a Halo car for Chrysler. They might as well have kept making the Prowler. I think the 300C is a much better Halo car for them.
It is a great deal if you look at it as an AMG Benz, but it's a bad deal if you look at it as a Chrysler, which is what it's sold as. It is not American muscle, it's all German. They should have put the Hemi in it, at least to give it some American blood.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: SuperTool
There is nothing Chrysler about this car except the badge. It's an AMG Mercedes made in Germany.
I frankly don't see much point to it. It's too boring to be a Halo car for Chrysler. They might as well have kept making the Prowler. I think the 300C is a much better Halo car for them.
It is a great deal if you look at it as an AMG Benz, but it's a bad deal if you look at it as a Chrysler, which is what it's sold as. It is not American muscle, it's all German. They should have put the Hemi in it, at least to give it some American blood.

could they fit a hemi in it?