Firefox's signed addon requirement

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,964
158
106
I believe it suppose to start in Firefox 41. Is there anyway around it or to disable it ? I know I could always use Waterfox or Palemoon but some addons don't work in them. For example Flagfox and Flash Control doesn't work in Waterfox :(
 

Z15CAM

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2010
2,184
64
91
www.flickr.com
Fk your Classic Theme Restorer it don't work with Windows DPI.

An then all the Plugins and Add On's only have a 50% workability let alone Adobe which, I believe, have a hard on for Mizollia.

FF v28.0 does just fine with a little understanding concerning Adobe Flash Player versions.

I don't care what Mizollia did after v28.0 but I wish thy would straighten it out.

I still use FF v28.0 as my main browser but just be aware that newer versions of Adobe Flash Player do not necessarily agree with it.
 
Last edited:

MustISO

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,927
12
81
Hopefully the developers will wise up and start signing their add-ons. Seems like a better option than disabling the feature in the browser. I'm still amazed at how many applications are still not signed. If it's not signed I just don't install it.
 

PliotronX

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
8,883
107
106
This would only be worth it if Mozilla will exclude any PUP extensions such as Ask Toolbar, Conduit, and all their derivatives. Otherwise, it's a bad move. My favorite extensions like uBlock and unMHT might not be signed so I will not use the latest version of FF making it pointless to use over Chrome.