- Feb 28, 2004
- 4,123
- 1
- 81
yes it does use less ram, i noticed that right away as i have utility that displays the ram usage of firefox.Thanks. So far it does feel a bit faster and it seems to use less RAM too - will keep an eye on it.
You can also download the full versions from here:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all
The changes are listed on this page:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/24.0/releasenotes
yes it does use less ram, i noticed that right away as i have utility that displays the ram usage of firefox.
biggest change with v24 for me is the new vsync support, ie scrolling with lightboost 120Hz = eyegasm, although Pale Moon beat official FF to v24, so I've been in scrolling heaven for a few days now
Yep totally agree. I noticed the same thing.
this is the first time in history that Pale Moon beats Firefox in terms of speed of final release
Pale Moon craps all over Firefox when it comes to speed and its lovely retro interface
Thanks for the heads up! I hope this version fixes the weird screen artifacts on some sites. I see them quite a bit on yahoo.
I hope you're wrong too. I think it only happens with firefox. If it happens again I'll take a screen shot and seek advice.Sounds like another issue (video card, especially), but hope I am worng.
Is this in IE? If so does it only affect IE or is it a system wide setting?HA - Hardware Acceleration: Tools > Options > Advanced > General > 'Use Hardware Acceleration when available'
First time I've heard of Pale Moon. Is it worth the download?