Fire Tv picture quality Kodi

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
Just wondering has anyone compared the Amazon Fire tv picture quality vs an Intel Nuc picture quality with both blu ray and dvd content? Are they close or is one better than the other? (local media mkv files)
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Kodi on a NUC will be better due to HD audio support, true 24p support, and the fact that a FireTV cannot play VC1 files worth a damn (many Blu Rays use the VC1 codec).

BUT

Does that matter to 90% of people? Hell no. Most don't have expensive speakers that can utilize HD audio, most can't see 3:2 judder, and most people don't rip their own Blu Rays to run into VC1 files (99% of content in the "scene" is x264). So I would argue that for most people the FireTV might be a better option, because then you easily get Kodi, Hulu, Amazon and Netflix on the same box.

Me? I am a purist. Every TV has a Chromebox running Kodi. Any ARM box outside of the Pi2 is unacceptable for me for Kodi use.

But I cannot recommend that for everyone.
 

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
Kodi on a NUC will be better due to HD audio support, true 24p support, and the fact that a FireTV cannot play VC1 files worth a damn (many Blu Rays use the VC1 codec).

BUT

Does that matter to 90% of people? Hell no. Most don't have expensive speakers that can utilize HD audio, most can't see 3:2 judder, and most people don't rip their own Blu Rays to run into VC1 files (99% of content in the "scene" is x264). So I would argue that for most people the FireTV might be a better option, because then you easily get Kodi, Hulu, Amazon and Netflix on the same box.

Me? I am a purist. Every TV has a Chromebox running Kodi. Any ARM box outside of the Pi2 is unacceptable for me for Kodi use.

But I cannot recommend that for everyone.

Thanks. I don't use a receiver but a good amount of my blu rays rips are probably VC1 files. Looks like I will use a Skylake NUC when they come out.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,348
642
121
Thanks. I don't use a receiver but a good amount of my blu rays rips are probably VC1 files. Looks like I will use a Skylake NUC when they come out.

Probably? Make sure....

I'd bet they're probably not VC1 and most likely x264.

But if they are, I'm surprised you'd go through the trouble to then not have an actual setup to watch the bluray on.... Pointless to me, but I'm in Poofy's camp of a high end audio setup. However, I can not tell the difference between a high bit rate encode and a blurray rip after much comparison. So I encode to high bitrate and I'm happy as long as it's high bitrate, and HD Audio. HD Audio is the most important to me, I love speakers/sound. I need a house so I can actually use my things lol. Soon!
 

Binky

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,046
4
81
The Pi2 can do VC-1 for an extra dollar or two. Its also a pretty cheap investment to try it out. You can get one from aliexpress with a crappy case for about $40. Not perfect, but very usable.
 

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
Probably? Make sure....

I'd bet they're probably not VC1 and most likely x264.

But if they are, I'm surprised you'd go through the trouble to then not have an actual setup to watch the bluray on.... Pointless to me, but I'm in Poofy's camp of a high end audio setup. However, I can not tell the difference between a high bit rate encode and a blurray rip after much comparison. So I encode to high bitrate and I'm happy as long as it's high bitrate, and HD Audio. HD Audio is the most important to me, I love speakers/sound. I need a house so I can actually use my things lol. Soon!

I do have a setup to watch my blu rays. I have Dune Smart media players and movies are stored on my Synology 1812 NAS. I had 4 but 1 died on my. Looking for replacement options. Most of my rips are in iso format. Slowly converting them to mkvs
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
The Pi2 can do VC-1 for an extra dollar or two. Its also a pretty cheap investment to try it out. You can get one from aliexpress with a crappy case for about $40. Not perfect, but very usable.

Very true. You have to pay for the codec, but the Pi 2 is the only arm Kodi device I trust to play VC1 files.
 

smitbret

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2006
3,382
17
81
Thanks. I don't use a receiver but a good amount of my blu rays rips are probably VC1 files. Looks like I will use a Skylake NUC when they come out.

Pi2 with the extra $4 for the MPEG-2 and VC-1 licenses will work fine. Skylake would be overkill.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Would there be much of a difference between a NUC and a Pi2?

-The NUC will run the interface on heavy skins smoother.

-A Skylake NUC will be able to play HEVC/10bit content that a Pi 2 can't (mostly matters for 4K and scene Anime)

-HD audio

Edit: Forgot that an x86 box can use some plugins that arm boxes can't use. This is changing fast though.

Otherwise not really. A Pi 2 is a GREAT 1080p Kodi device.
 
Last edited:

Binky

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,046
4
81
On top of what poofy said, there is another difference. On the NUC (or the Chromebox), you can load up your favorite linux distro like Kodibuntu, and then load Kodi AND Plex clients on that. Why you ask? I have no idea. It's far more complicated to do this than just using Openelec.

I personally feel a little constrained on the Rpi2 since I can't install Plex on an Arm device. Not that I need plex. I really don't. I'm just a tweak-whore and I feel a little empty inside when I can't configure something in every possible way even if I have no use for it. I love my Rpi2 though. Its super simple to get running and it works well.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,351
16,727
136
When I bought the pi b+ I also bought the MPEG and VC license however with the pi 2 not only does it seem like I don't need it, I don't even see where I would enter in the license.

I use, recalbox or openelec. Do those distros not need the license?

I also do full bluray rips as well for uncompressed video and audio.
 

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
-The NUC will run the interface on heavy skins smoother.

-A Skylake NUC will be able to play HEVC/10bit content that a Pi 2 can't (mostly matters for 4K and scene Anime)

-HD audio

Edit: Forgot that an x86 box can use some plugins that arm boxes can't use. This is changing fast though.

Otherwise not really. A Pi 2 is a GREAT 1080p Kodi device.

Sorry I meant to ask if there would be much of a difference in picture quality. Was a long day yesterday.
 

smitbret

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2006
3,382
17
81
Sorry I meant to ask if there would be much of a difference in picture quality. Was a long day yesterday.

No. PQ will be comparable. I suppose if you tried to run something like MadVR to tweak things then the NUC would be better but otherwise, the Pi2 runs everything great. As far as smoothness with some of the heavier skins, I haven't noticed much difference between my Chromebox and the RPi2. I do run the GUI at 720p instead of 1080p but I don't know if that makes much difference.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Sorry I meant to ask if there would be much of a difference in picture quality. Was a long day yesterday.

The only thing I can think of is a NUC can deinterlace 1080i content better. But so little is 1080i.

The Pi 2 really is a rockstar for Kodi.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
They just announced the release date for the new Fire TV, ICYMI

It is still running an Android fork so it will probably have the same limitations as the current Firetv minus better HEVC support.

What makes the Pi 2 standout is great regular Linux support.
 

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
Question i have a 4k Samsung tv. Openelec on the Nuc is defaulting to 4k resolution instead on 1920x1080. The resolution settings are greyed out. How do i fix that?(picture quality is better when i let the tv do the upscaling.