- Mar 23, 2010
- 1,558
- 1,181
- 136
So like many of you, i purchased a Dell 2005fpw in 2006. At the time it supposedly had some of the best colors, blacks, contrast level and viewing angle of any contemporary TFT LCD. It has served me so well these past 5 years..
but alas, about a month ago it started "clicking" on and off at startup about ever 2 restarts of my computer. it is now to the point where the only way it will not power cycle is i either have to A. leave my computer on all the time so it doesn't ever go idle or B. let it cool down a min ~4 hours for whatever reason before it will function normally.
research tells me it has some bad caps on either the logic or power board.. so until I feel like actually attempting that repair, i decided to treat my humble system to a rare upgrade.
a little more research and I decide on an Asus ML249H 24" 1080p monitor.
its a good size upgrade: 20" to 24"
great price: paid 229 shipped
plus i read that the Asus with its MVA panel was just as good as an S-IPS such as my out going 2005fpw.
I wasn't eager to go from 16:10 to 16:9 however..
So i get the panel home and eagerly set it up.
Here is the ML249H side by side with my 2005fpw. I just wasn't happy AT ALL!
When I first booted up and saw my familiar desktop and very familiar starcraft 2 shortcut.. my heart sank. Colors were washed out and over pumped to make up for good contrast and saturation; that was the most obvious thing that hit me right away. It was also dim and only barely bright enough with brightness turned up.. and with a monitor that size.. the off angle viewing was disgusting.
With my line of sight centered in the middle of the monitor, all 4 corners were a little washed out and if i moved to look at any corner head on, sure enough they looked slightly better. I did as much as a I could in the monitors own settings menu, my radeon control panel, and even windows color correction and no combo of settings yielded a good combination.
So monitor tech really hasn't trickled down that much I see.. I know the Dell was about $500 back then but still for a $250 monitor half a decade later I assumed that surely it would equal it.
So I turned to Ebay for something I knew I could trust performance and picture-wise for an equivalent amount of coin
^Dell 2407WFP
I scored this baby for 239 shipped on fleabay. And guys let me tell you, I wouldn't sit down for an hour to write a forum post about monitor if I wasn't that much in love with this thing. The picture is absolutely BEAUTIFUL.
Starcraft 2 came back to life and its plenty fast for Bad company 2; web browsing no longer induces eye strain and headache from over pumped hyper blue whites. The whites are instead now a gentle neutral shade that is very natural looking while being luminous but not overly bright.
My first impression physically was that for the same size, 16:10 looks so much bigger than the Asus which is 16:9 1080p. The extra lines of resolution sure are nice too.
The color is warmer and much, much more accurate with true, non blue whites. I don't have any hardware calibration tools, but the Dell looks pretty damn close to my ISF calibrated Panny Plasma. Text is crisper and white and shadow detail is much improved along with black level. As well as off angle viewing; well there's just no comparison.
Bottom Line: ML249 was sent back to amazon and hopefully this Dell 2407WFP can serve me a good 5 years or more like its predecessor.
but alas, about a month ago it started "clicking" on and off at startup about ever 2 restarts of my computer. it is now to the point where the only way it will not power cycle is i either have to A. leave my computer on all the time so it doesn't ever go idle or B. let it cool down a min ~4 hours for whatever reason before it will function normally.
research tells me it has some bad caps on either the logic or power board.. so until I feel like actually attempting that repair, i decided to treat my humble system to a rare upgrade.
a little more research and I decide on an Asus ML249H 24" 1080p monitor.
its a good size upgrade: 20" to 24"
great price: paid 229 shipped
plus i read that the Asus with its MVA panel was just as good as an S-IPS such as my out going 2005fpw.
I wasn't eager to go from 16:10 to 16:9 however..
So i get the panel home and eagerly set it up.

Here is the ML249H side by side with my 2005fpw. I just wasn't happy AT ALL!
When I first booted up and saw my familiar desktop and very familiar starcraft 2 shortcut.. my heart sank. Colors were washed out and over pumped to make up for good contrast and saturation; that was the most obvious thing that hit me right away. It was also dim and only barely bright enough with brightness turned up.. and with a monitor that size.. the off angle viewing was disgusting.
With my line of sight centered in the middle of the monitor, all 4 corners were a little washed out and if i moved to look at any corner head on, sure enough they looked slightly better. I did as much as a I could in the monitors own settings menu, my radeon control panel, and even windows color correction and no combo of settings yielded a good combination.
So monitor tech really hasn't trickled down that much I see.. I know the Dell was about $500 back then but still for a $250 monitor half a decade later I assumed that surely it would equal it.
So I turned to Ebay for something I knew I could trust performance and picture-wise for an equivalent amount of coin

^Dell 2407WFP
I scored this baby for 239 shipped on fleabay. And guys let me tell you, I wouldn't sit down for an hour to write a forum post about monitor if I wasn't that much in love with this thing. The picture is absolutely BEAUTIFUL.
Starcraft 2 came back to life and its plenty fast for Bad company 2; web browsing no longer induces eye strain and headache from over pumped hyper blue whites. The whites are instead now a gentle neutral shade that is very natural looking while being luminous but not overly bright.
My first impression physically was that for the same size, 16:10 looks so much bigger than the Asus which is 16:9 1080p. The extra lines of resolution sure are nice too.

The color is warmer and much, much more accurate with true, non blue whites. I don't have any hardware calibration tools, but the Dell looks pretty damn close to my ISF calibrated Panny Plasma. Text is crisper and white and shadow detail is much improved along with black level. As well as off angle viewing; well there's just no comparison.
Bottom Line: ML249 was sent back to amazon and hopefully this Dell 2407WFP can serve me a good 5 years or more like its predecessor.
