Yep...A company struggling to keep up by butchering together old technology. I'll miss that like a bad case of crabs.Originally posted by: BFG10K
Geez, $900? Yowser. :Q
Yet again it's another reminder of what could have been if 3dfx had stayed alive...
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Imagine 4 R350 cores on 1 card, with 256MB GDDR3
That could be something to behold (and it might need its own PSU! )
That's a pretty narrow-minded view of the company. Yes they did slip behind but the technology they had coming out (Rampage, Spectre) would have likely blown everyone away.Yep...A company struggling to keep up by butchering together old technology. I'll miss that like a bad case of crabs.
Originally posted by: codehack2
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Imagine 4 R350 cores on 1 card, with 256MB GDDR3
That could be something to behold (and it might need its own PSU! )
Sounds like a redundant waste of technology to me... You realize that your limiting each GPU to 64mb (roughly, the 4 chips will share a frame buffer and split the remaining memory 4 ways for texture memory.) 3dfx stuck multiple chips on a single card and banked the memory because they could not produce a single chip solution that matched the fill rate numbers that Nvida was posting. 3dfx didn't choose that path because it was superior, they choose it because they had to inorder to compete.
CH2
, it is not the final board though, they never made it to finals.
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Imagine 4 R350 cores on 1 card, with 256MB GDDR3
That could be something to behold (and it might need its own PSU! )
It was never released bu they did have a small number fo boards that did make it to final silicon/PCB revision... which was Model 4400 or 3400 or something.... can't remeber specifically.