finally 100% windows free

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
I figure this forum is as good a place as any.

As of 8am this morning, I am 100% windows free.

I've been a linux + osx user at home for some time now, but my work computer always had windows on it. This was because I had to run crystal reports. But we recently switched to Jasper reports. So I was able to get them to buy me a macbook pro and now I am 100% windows free in the office.

Happy days.
 
May 13, 2009
12,333
612
126
You act like windows is a bad thing. I used linux for one day and was begging for my windows back.
 

slugg

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
4,723
80
91
I love my Mac. I try to use it as much as possible.

Windows offers many amazing tools that are simply not available on other platforms. Linux has some major advantages, especially in academics.

So... I feel bad that you're "Windows Free" because you're missing out.
 

Kmax82

Diamond Member
Feb 23, 2002
3,008
0
0
www.kennonbickhart.com
Originally posted by: slugg
I love my Mac. I try to use it as much as possible.

Windows offers many amazing tools that are simply not available on other platforms. Linux has some major advantages, especially in academics.

So... I feel bad that you're "Windows Free" because you're missing out.

I object a little. I don't mind Windows, but I in no way feel gimped by solely using OS X. What tools do you use (aside from games) that you feel warrant the need for Windows on your Mac?
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,599
126
Originally posted by: Kmax82
I object a little. I don't mind Windows, but I in no way feel gimped by solely using OS X. What tools do you use (aside from games) that you feel warrant the need for Windows on your Mac?

Remote Desktop, Office, Steam, half a million corporate apps...

Oh yeah, most importantly:

NTFS external hard drives.
 

Kmax82

Diamond Member
Feb 23, 2002
3,008
0
0
www.kennonbickhart.com
Remote Desktop is available on Windows, Office is not necessary for 90% of what it's used for, Steam is a gaming platform (I said other than games), MacFuse offers NTFS support.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,599
126
Originally posted by: Kmax82
Remote Desktop is available on Windows, Office is not necessary for 90% of what it's used for, Steam is a gaming platform (I said other than games), MacFuse offers NTFS support.

And these are all things I use my PC for :)


I'm just sayin, limiting yourself to OSX only is pretty foolish (although I might change my tune after I get bootcamp and everything setup properly...the only thing I'd be missing out on is Steam...decisions decisions).
 

Kmax82

Diamond Member
Feb 23, 2002
3,008
0
0
www.kennonbickhart.com
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: Kmax82
Remote Desktop is available on Windows, Office is not necessary for 90% of what it's used for, Steam is a gaming platform (I said other than games), MacFuse offers NTFS support.

And these are all things I use my PC for :)


I'm just sayin, limiting yourself to OSX only is pretty foolish (although I might change my tune after I get bootcamp and everything setup properly...the only thing I'd be missing out on is Steam...decisions decisions).

I agree. I wasn't trying to dispute that. I was just saying that you don't necessarily need Windows. I still use Windows for Web Development (you have to support IE, unfortunately), and gaming. But aside from that, I haven't needed to boot into Windows for support for any applications. Everything has been doable under OS X. :)
 

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
How is it foolish. I now have a environment I am familiar with with tools I actually enjoy for my job. There is not one single task I have ever needed to do on a computer that could not be done just as easily in linux or mac.

Let's look at my job.

Email is google so I'm covered and integrated into mail
Calendar is google again covered and integrated into icalendar
Chat - we use google, so ichat has me covered (although I use adium so i can talk to friends at home via msn)
Terminal - I finally have a real terminal at work. No more flakey cygwin!!
Database access - we use oracle sql developer. Same program on widows or mac
Programing - I freaking love TextMate and I'm starting to love Xcode more and more everyday as I use it at home for projects.
Source code repository - I have and always will use a command line for this. Same in both places.
Music - I like itunes, and itunes on windows sucks, big win for me.
MULTIPLE DESKTOPS that actually work!!!
VPN - we use openvpn, the mac client is WAY better then the windows one which requires admin access.
Data protection - Filevault is easy to use and our licenses of vista do not include bitlocker. We use truecrypt for usb sticks and truecrypt works just fine on macs.
Photoshop - hey unlike my linux box, I have photoshop
Flash - hey, same as above.
Browsers - firefox and safari. I use firefox on my macs and on windows. No change here except I like safari better and safari on windows blows.
iphone development - we can finally start doing iphone development at work.
Novell access - we have afp support on novell, so I can just map the drives. Same as I did on windows.
Building reports - no more crystal reports! We are using jasper reports and finding them much better. Full linux, mac, and windows support.
SCT Banner - just works on mac, unlike windows and linux which require me to screw around with java versions.
Remote desktop - Microsoft makes a GREAT remote desktop client for osx. I have no will I ever let anyone remote into my notebook. So I don't need that. All of our servers are linux, and osx has ssh, so I'm covered.
Office - we are in the process of moving to open office. In the mean time, I have Microsoft office for mac. Works great.


On top of all that, a desktop environment that I enjoy and works the way I want it to.

i don't begrudge people from using windows. It has valid use cases. For example, we I had to use crystal reports, windows made sense. Running it in a VM just to switch operating systems is silly. My job no longer requires me to use windows, so i was finally able to use an operating system that makes me more productive and I enjoy. I use what makes sense for my job. I was due a new notebook, so I made the choice that made the most sense. If this was a server it would of been dell or sun. If it was for a computer lab that teaches microsoft C++ it would of been dell with windows. But it was for me. So now it has the tools I like to use, on the OS that works like I want it.
 

slugg

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
4,723
80
91
Going down the list, on the side of Windows/MS...

Email - Outlook/Entourage is way better than Apple's Mail.
Calendar - Outlook/Entourage
Chat - we use google, so ichat has me covered (although I use adium so i can talk to friends at home via msn)
Terminal - Putty? I mean, you _will_ be remoting, right? If not, then yea Mac OS X wins.
Database access - Oracle, MySQL, and various MS databases...
Programing - MS Visual Studio. Hands down. MS is a software giant - their tools are the best in the industry.
Source code repository - SVN and CVS both work from within Visual Studio, or you can use a multitude of clients (like Tortoise)
Music - iTunes on Windows is just fine? Oh and you get WinAmp, if you're into that. Oh and you have the option for Zune, if you're into that.
Virtual Desktops - Yea, OS X wins by a longshot. Linux has some good options too.
VPN - Do it on a managed network and you're fine. The Windows option is very easy.
Data protection - Ehh... many options here. All operating systems have something good.
Photoshop - Hey look at those Windows versus OS X benchmarks ;)
Flash - I must also mention Silverlight. Good luck developing Silverlight apps on a Mac.
Browsers - IE, Firefox, Opera, and what's this... SAFARI. Everything you need, one OS ;)
iPhone Development - Yup, OS X wins.
Novell access - cake.
Building reports - Jasper and Crystal are fine...
SCT Banner - I have no comment on this. Not familiar with it.
Remote desktop - OS X's solution is through VNC, which is absolute crap compared to MS's RDP.
Office - MS Office is worth the money. Open Office is fine for super basic stuff, but there's so much more support and you'll spend a lot less time doing your work with MS Office. Not to mention, Outlook is the best money can buy.

Added:
Engineering Apps - Mathematica and Matlab run like crap on Linux and Mac as compared to Windows. Matlab isn't so bad, but there's a huge difference with Mathematica. Also, CAD software is extremely limited on Linux and Mac.
Gaming - I'm not a gamer, but a lot of people are. Windows wins.


So my point is... yes, OS X and Linux have advantages, but Windows offers a _LOT_ of compatibility, more so than any other OS. The development tools available on Windows dwarf those on Mac OS X and Linux. There's no denying that Microsoft .NET technology is amazing. Hell, these forums are running on .NET! Same with Newegg and MySpace. Direct X is also at the top of the food chain for consumer multimedia applications.

To completely drop an OS for the sake of doing it is kind of pointless. I use all three platforms so that I can get my work done as fast as possible. I _COULD_ completely switch to any one platform, but then that's just limiting myself. Why would I stop myself from using Visual Studio if I have the opportunity? Why should I refuse to use MS Outlook? Why should I use my Mac for newsgroups, when NewsBin (Windows) is the best news client out there? It just doesn't make sense.

Follow the money. If Windows was so bad, large corporations wouldn't be using it. They have demands that Microsoft is able to supply solutions for at an overall cheaper price than other competitors. If this wasn't the case, MS wouldn't have so many customers. Simple economics...

Before anyone tags me as a fanboy, I'd like to say that I'm typing this post on my 100% genuine, non-hack, Mac.

 

umrigar

Platinum Member
Jun 3, 2004
2,088
0
0
there's really no reason to have an NTFS-formatted external drive, is there? FAT32 too outdated?
what are the limitations of HFS+, which has been around since Mac OS 8.1?
 

TheStu

Moderator<br>Mobile Devices & Gadgets
Moderator
Sep 15, 2004
12,089
45
91
Originally posted by: umrigar
there's really no reason to have an NTFS-formatted external drive, is there? FAT32 too outdated?
what are the limitations of HFS+, which has been around since Mac OS 8.1?

Windows has a 90% market share, NTFS is the de facto standard on Windows, having an NTFS formatted external that you can write to (Since OS X supports read by default) is useful if any of your friends use Windows, or if you dual boot and don't want to spend $40 on MacDrive (or whatever it is)

FAT32 has a 4GB file size limit, which I don't know about you, but that severely cramps my style.

HFS+, other than not working with Windows has no glaring deficiencies that I am aware of. At least not along the lines of FAT32's 4GB limit.

There is exFAT, but that is currently only supported by Microsoft on Vista or later I believe.
 

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
Originally posted by: slugg
Going down the list, on the side of Windows/MS...

Email - Outlook/Entourage is way better than Apple's Mail.
Personal opinion. I mostly use the gmail webpage. I use apple mail only for times when I have no network access and need to find an email.

Originally posted by: slugg
Calendar - Outlook/Entourage
Personal opinion again.

Originally posted by: slugg
Terminal - Putty? I mean, you _will_ be remoting, right? If not, then yea Mac OS X wins.
Putty is a crappy terminal for ssh. No real terminal work is done that way. Even cygwin/X and xterm is a better choice.
Originally posted by: slugg
Database access - Oracle, MySQL, and various MS databases...
Your point? I can access any database I want, and most importantly, every database I need to.
Originally posted by: slugg
Programing - MS Visual Studio. Hands down. MS is a software giant - their tools are the best in the industry.
Personal opinion again. I can't stand visual studoo. I flat out hate it. Even when I was forced to do .net work I did not use visual studio.
Originally posted by: slugg
Data protection - Ehh... many options here. All operating systems have something good.
Nothing as easy for what my work has licensed. As I said, vista business doesn't have bitlocker, and truecrypt is full disk encryption, which is more then I really want. In linux I can encrypt my home directory easily. In windows I'm SOL unless I convince my boss to needlessly upgrade our licensing to the next tier.

Originally posted by: slugg
Photoshop - Hey look at those Windows versus OS X benchmarks ;)
I'm using a notebook, do you think I'm doing heavy work. I'm a software developer. I need to make a small button now and then for a website, or an icon.
Originally posted by: slugg
Flash - I must also mention Silverlight. Good luck developing Silverlight apps on a Mac.
Good. I'm trying to get rid of flash, the last thing I want to do is replace it with another plugin required piece of garbage.
Originally posted by: slugg
Browsers - IE, Firefox, Opera, and what's this... SAFARI. Everything you need, one OS ;)
Firefox, Opera, and safari. Everything you need, one OS :) I fixed that for you. The fact is, testing is not my job. So I need browsers I want to use. Safari on windows horrid. I think apple makes it horrid in some strange attempt to make you think windows sucks.

Originally posted by: slugg
SCT Banner - I have no comment on this. Not familiar with it.
Hundred thousand buck software that almost all real universities use as their core business logic.
Originally posted by: slugg
Remote desktop - OS X's solution is through VNC, which is absolute crap compared to MS's RDP.
and? I can RDP to windows machines if I need to, and no one ever needs to remote to my machine. It's a notebook after all.

Originally posted by: slugg
Office - MS Office is worth the money. Open Office is fine for super basic stuff, but there's so much more support and you'll spend a lot less time doing your work with MS Office. Not to mention, Outlook is the best money can buy.
More opinion. But yes outlook is the best money can buy. But the free stuff is better ;-)

Originally posted by: slugg
Added:
Engineering Apps - Mathematica and Matlab run like crap on Linux and Mac as compared to Windows. Matlab isn't so bad, but there's a huge difference with Mathematica. Also, CAD software is extremely limited on Linux and Mac.
Gaming - I'm not a gamer, but a lot of people are. Windows wins.
This is relevant to my switching how? I guess my job could suddenly change to windows game testing, or maybe I could become a CAD designer. Probably not though.

Originally posted by: slugg
So my point is... yes, OS X and Linux have advantages, but Windows offers a _LOT_ of compatibility, more so than any other OS. The development tools available on Windows dwarf those on Mac OS X and Linux. There's no denying that Microsoft .NET technology is amazing. Hell, these forums are running on .NET! Same with Newegg and MySpace. Direct X is also at the top of the food chain for consumer multimedia applications.
Again, opinion. I personally do not like .NET and have turned down jobs that required me to work in .NET. Mainly because I do not like visual studio and most jobs will require me to use that. Further more I think VB.net is garbage in terms of language syntax and that the VM is useless because it is only officially supported on windows. If I was going to write for windows only, I'd stick with C++ which I know very well and doesn't require me to use some kind of magic box. When I want cross compatibility on the web I'll use python, php, ruby, java, hell even perl if you want. (Ok so not perl). This is my personal opinion. DirectX is nice, but has no baring on my ability to work. I'm not a game designer nor would I want to be.

Originally posted by: slugg
To completely drop an OS for the sake of doing it is kind of pointless. I use all three platforms so that I can get my work done as fast as possible. I _COULD_ completely switch to any one platform, but then that's just limiting myself. Why would I stop myself from using Visual Studio if I have the opportunity? Why should I refuse to use MS Outlook? Why should I use my Mac for newsgroups, when NewsBin (Windows) is the best news client out there? It just doesn't make sense.
Again, you assume I dropped it solely because I hate windows. I didn't. I dropped it because I am more comfortable working in OSX. I have the tools I need in the format and environment I enjoy. It wasn't some "Gee, windows sucks, lets drop it". I can't think of a single reason I would want to use windows. I have no windows computers in my home and haven't had one for years. I used linux, then moved to mac. Why would I want to use an OS so dissimilar to one I use at home at work? That's why microsoft took off in the first place, because people wanted to use what they used at work at home.

To use windows just for the sake of using windows is pointless. I gain no advantages as I can do everything I want on mac, and I don't have to figure out the "windows" way of doing what I want. I can't use automator, I can't write applescripts to manage gui apps. I can't write bash scripts to manage command line apps. I don't have to keep screwing up and typing ifconfig when I mean ipconfig, or ls when I mean dir. I will stop getting ticked when I hit alt-c to copy because my hands are used to command-c. I'll stop hitting the non-existent dashboard button to see my stocks and the weather. And my expose key will actually be there. When I hit command arrow I'll move the cursor like I expect. Also, a minor thing but my touch pad will be 3 times bigger then any windows touch pad and my keyboard will have a back light.

Originally posted by: slugg
Follow the money. If Windows was so bad, large corporations wouldn't be using it. They have demands that Microsoft is able to supply solutions for at an overall cheaper price than other competitors. If this wasn't the case, MS wouldn't have so many customers. Simple economics...
Never said windows was bad. Not once. However, in my market (education) microsoft is losing huge footholds. For example, we used to have our own imap server. We wanted something easier to manage, so we compared exchange and google side by side. Google won. It was easier to manage, the users took to it better without training, and it saved us about 15 thousand bucks a year. Not to mention the 30 thousand it would of cost to start up exchange. We did a study on moving from novell to active directory. We found after brining in 3 or 4 companies to pitch it that we couldn't come close to what novell can do for anywhere near the price we pay. We found that 95% of our users can meet their needs with open office, so we are moving that direction. We moved the campus to firefox and found a 5% drop in calls to remove spyware and adware (not that we had many). By moving our servers from windows to linux we freed up enough overhead on our ESX servers to add 5 more servers then we had additionally plotted for. The servers moved were our web server, our repository server, or "cron job" server, our data warehouse server (big database server), and our reports server. We also moved many kiosks to linux and found a reduced instance in support calls to fix broken kiosks. (They are just big web browsers and word editors anyways)


But it's not just Microsoft we are picking on. We are also dumping Sun like it's going out of style. The market is tight and we have to pick the solutions that make sense. We have moved major business logic from solaris 9 servers to CentOS instead of solaris 10. This allowed for a huge drop hardware and support costs.

So unless I find one thing I just have to have to do my job that requires windows, there is simply no point of having a windows computer. I simply do not enjoy using them. As you can see in my comments my reasoning and your reasoning come down to simply opinion. I didn't see any technical reasons why I would want to use windows. I have also not listed many technical reasons why I do not (aside from some apps I like on mac that linux and windows do not have). This was also not a anti windows post. I didn't leave windows alone. I also left linux. I don't use linux at home anymore, and I don't use windows at work anymore (still have linux servers and that is probably not changing for a long long time). I still have a few windows servers to manage (our MFP machines require a windows server to manage access for example). But my personal machines are now all mac, and I like it that way.

It seems to really distress a lot of people to think that people can be happy without windows. I can't understand why. People tell me how I NEED windows to do real work. Maybe they need windows, or maybe they just like windows more. But the fact is unless you can show me a better way to do my job on windows (which is again opinion) I simply don't need it.

To me OSX is the best of both worlds. I get the few pieces of commercial software that are important to me (and the few games on PC that are important as well) and all the things that made me switch to linux (bash, hundreds of open source tools, etc). On top of that I get a user interface and development tools for that environment that I are more intuitive to me then anything I have found on windows and linux.
 

postmortemIA

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2006
7,721
40
91
dissing .NET and you call his post opinionated? whatever, not worth reading you after that.
 

Koing

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator<br> Health and F
Oct 11, 2000
16,843
2
0
Trading software isn't mac compatible and no one at work uses a Mac. I use a MacBook at home though and can citrix in to my desktop and use the trading software that way, but thats hardly the best way :p

Koing
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Follow the money. If Windows was so bad, large corporations wouldn't be using it. They have demands that Microsoft is able to supply solutions for at an overall cheaper price than other competitors. If this wasn't the case, MS wouldn't have so many customers. Simple economics...

No, MS is just grandfathered in. They were the first to get huge marketshare on the desktop back when the alternatives sucked, now the alternatives are better IMO but it's too difficult to edge MS because that's what everyone's used to using.

While I'm not a fan of the whole "Web 2.0" and "Cloud Computing" crap because I like having locally installed apps and control over everything, but I hope it becomes more popular just so that people become less tied to Windows. The more web apps there are out there the less reason people have to run Windows for the same functionality.
 

Kmax82

Diamond Member
Feb 23, 2002
3,008
0
0
www.kennonbickhart.com
Originally posted by: Koing
Trading software isn't mac compatible and no one at work uses a Mac. I use a MacBook at home though and can citrix in to my desktop and use the trading software that way, but thats hardly the best way :p

Koing

You could always just use a whittled down VM for that. That's what I do for IE compatibility and it's lightning quick. I just start it when I sit down at my computer and leave it running all day. I don't even notice it. Works seamlessly.

That to me is the real benefit of Macs. I can have Linux/OS X/Windows all running at the same time. I'd prefer not to need Windows, simply because of the hassle of having to maintain the OS... but the fact that I can just have it in the background and click on an app when I need it is great.
 

umrigar

Platinum Member
Jun 3, 2004
2,088
0
0
what files over 4 GB do you regularly use?

Even a DVD rip has files < 2GB each.

NTFS is useful for internal drives; for MOST people, FAT32 is good enough for an external.

MacDrive for Windows allows a PC to read/write HFS+ drives.

Not getting into which is better/worse. At least having a Mac nowadays allows dual boot & virtualization with very little performance hit so you can run Windows-only stuff as well.
Seems to me having a Mac just allows you do do more; Windows is limited.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
That to me is the real benefit of Macs. I can have Linux/OS X/Windows all running at the same time.

The only reason that's special is because of Apple. If Apple wasn't so tyranical about their software you could have that combination on any PC.

what files over 4 GB do you regularly use?

Even a DVD rip has files < 2GB each.

Non-transcoded DVDs are >4G, as are images of game that come on DVDs and a lot of VM disk images. And with HDDVDs and BluRay becoming popular images of them will become more popular too. If you backup a system to a single file that will almost always be over 4G as well.

NTFS is useful for internal drives; for MOST people, FAT32 is good enough for an external.

FAT is a last resort, it's only real use that I see as valid is for small flash drives.
 

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
Originally posted by: postmortemIA
dissing .NET and you call his post opinionated? whatever, not worth reading you after that.

If you would have read it, you would of understood the point. Yes it is opinionated and that is the only reason.

He says .NET is awesome. I say it isn't. It's opinion. My point was my reasoning is mostly opinion and his argument is opinion. While there are technical and philosophical reasons why I don't like .NET (Is not cross platform, is made by a company known for vendor lock in, etc). The biggest reasons are simply opinion.

Seems you missed the whole point.
 

umrigar

Platinum Member
Jun 3, 2004
2,088
0
0
"Non-transcoded DVDs are >4G" ... in a single file? or separate files within the VIDEO_TS folder?